Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8499220" data-attributes="member: 572595">[quote name=&#039;wew lad&#039;]id absolutely love to see this box lol [USER=668837]@BoogerMan[/USER] nailed it</blockquote>i cheaked his measurements and its 5.1 tuned to 33. they should sound decent in there. but looking at the parameters the FS of 39 with a CMS of 0.08 its not gonna have much lowend unless you do about 6.5 tuned to 34.. they aren&amp;#39;t made to get low. im sorry but SQ makes cheap ****. i Didn&amp;#39;t like my HDC3. within a month i re-coned it because it was literally one of the worst sounding drivers I&amp;#39;ve even used. PSI gave me a re-cone and recently i played it&nbsp; because i put it for sale a jeff made a good point. OMG it sounded so much better its not even funny. granted it was pretty loud with the original soft parts its just not a good sounding driver. with a CMS of .08 and a QES of .6 its much more at home in a pro-sound application with a very large vernted box..[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8499220, member: 572595"] [quote name='wew lad']id absolutely love to see this box lol [USER=668837]@BoogerMan[/USER] nailed it[/QUOTE] i cheaked his measurements and its 5.1 tuned to 33. they should sound decent in there. but looking at the parameters the FS of 39 with a CMS of 0.08 its not gonna have much lowend unless you do about 6.5 tuned to 34.. they aren't made to get low. im sorry but SQ makes cheap ****. i Didn't like my HDC3. within a month i re-coned it because it was literally one of the worst sounding drivers I've even used. PSI gave me a re-cone and recently i played it because i put it for sale a jeff made a good point. OMG it sounded so much better its not even funny. granted it was pretty loud with the original soft parts its just not a good sounding driver. with a CMS of .08 and a QES of .6 its much more at home in a pro-sound application with a very large vernted box.. [/QUOTE]

Verification