Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Moble Enclosurs" data-source="post: 7915703" data-attributes="member: 634917">I like you too bro. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif The textbooks only go so far. Take for instance the 1940s versions of quarter-wave theory. They have been vastly improved since then. I use a lot of my own redefined figures from formulas of acoustical circuitry when dealing with driver specifications so there is a truth to a lot of the basis of audio that no one can argue. It is the fact that some theory retains its explanation and does not go further than that. This is why they are called theories. But, the best designers learn from this. I am very glad that I am not the only one. Textbooks will only get you so far, that is the point. Unfortunately, a lot of my suggestions cannot go much further than that due to the work I have put into the modifications needed for such theories to become practical. Try to tell someone that a 7th harmonic matches the rest, and if they are in the mindset that if the 1-6th and 8th match the 7th has to, then they will argue that to the death....regardless of what actual testing will show. It is based on mere lack of knowledge. I agree that it is not all about math and my initial communication in the forum was very &#039;&#039;textbook&#039;&#039;, but I must say that most of my responses are not from an actual textbook. Nor can anyone really replicate my calculations. But all in all, I like the honesty.Speaking of which, I do hope you are able to make some great success with your novel and such in the future man! Very happy for you!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Moble Enclosurs, post: 7915703, member: 634917"] I like you too bro. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif[/IMG] The textbooks only go so far. Take for instance the 1940s versions of quarter-wave theory. They have been vastly improved since then. I use a lot of my own redefined figures from formulas of acoustical circuitry when dealing with driver specifications so there is a truth to a lot of the basis of audio that no one can argue. It is the fact that some theory retains its explanation and does not go further than that. This is why they are called theories. But, the best designers learn from this. I am very glad that I am not the only one. Textbooks will only get you so far, that is the point. Unfortunately, a lot of my suggestions cannot go much further than that due to the work I have put into the modifications needed for such theories to become practical. Try to tell someone that a 7th harmonic matches the rest, and if they are in the mindset that if the 1-6th and 8th match the 7th has to, then they will argue that to the death....regardless of what actual testing will show. It is based on mere lack of knowledge. I agree that it is not all about math and my initial communication in the forum was very ''textbook'', but I must say that most of my responses are not from an actual textbook. Nor can anyone really replicate my calculations. But all in all, I like the honesty. Speaking of which, I do hope you are able to make some great success with your novel and such in the future man! Very happy for you! [/QUOTE]

Verification