Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Shallow mount vs 8 inch vs radical modification
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hispls" data-source="post: 8799789" data-attributes="member: 614752"><p>I'll see if I can download either of those tracks to confirm but I doubt you'll need to tune lower than 40hz to play either.</p><p></p><p>That said, as we explained earlier you're fighting a losing battle against Hoffman's Iron Law and any way you slice it you're either using small piston area or larger piston area with less stroke. You just hit the wall with how much air you can move in that style vehicle and generally speaking the acoustics of trying to get good low frequency while keeping functionality of rear seats isn't great in that body style.</p><p></p><p>IF you can get a ported box down there somehow that would help some but I don't think believe one or the other out of the ideas presented is going to be a dramatic difference.</p><p></p><p>I would definitely agree that judging components based on the rather perfect-world conditions of a listening room in a shop is not going to give you an accurate expectation of what to expect when mounted in a vehicle.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hispls, post: 8799789, member: 614752"] I'll see if I can download either of those tracks to confirm but I doubt you'll need to tune lower than 40hz to play either. That said, as we explained earlier you're fighting a losing battle against Hoffman's Iron Law and any way you slice it you're either using small piston area or larger piston area with less stroke. You just hit the wall with how much air you can move in that style vehicle and generally speaking the acoustics of trying to get good low frequency while keeping functionality of rear seats isn't great in that body style. IF you can get a ported box down there somehow that would help some but I don't think believe one or the other out of the ideas presented is going to be a dramatic difference. I would definitely agree that judging components based on the rather perfect-world conditions of a listening room in a shop is not going to give you an accurate expectation of what to expect when mounted in a vehicle. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Shallow mount vs 8 inch vs radical modification
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh