Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Science vs. The Bible!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Seth_3515" data-source="post: 6452514" data-attributes="member: 598407"><p>science vs religion in period is not debatable once again... The reason being is that science has nothing to do with religion. Science. as said earlier, is based on predictable, testable theories. (apples) Religion is based on the beliefs and also as said earlier the "describings" of reality. (oranges) If you are saying this topic is debatable you are either a religous person trying void your knowledge of anything that might suggest your religous beliefs may not be spot on to what is really happening or you are just someone with no true religous beliefs and no real scientific background.. Science is neutral any real scientist will not use science to persuade a religous belief that is wrong. Science should only be used to simply inform and not discredit a belief. so if you say this topic is debatable you really need to talk with a real scientist and understand scientific evidence is only to inform not persuade, discredit, falsely credit, etc any sort of religion</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Seth_3515, post: 6452514, member: 598407"] science vs religion in period is not debatable once again... The reason being is that science has nothing to do with religion. Science. as said earlier, is based on predictable, testable theories. (apples) Religion is based on the beliefs and also as said earlier the "describings" of reality. (oranges) If you are saying this topic is debatable you are either a religous person trying void your knowledge of anything that might suggest your religous beliefs may not be spot on to what is really happening or you are just someone with no true religous beliefs and no real scientific background.. Science is neutral any real scientist will not use science to persuade a religous belief that is wrong. Science should only be used to simply inform and not discredit a belief. so if you say this topic is debatable you really need to talk with a real scientist and understand scientific evidence is only to inform not persuade, discredit, falsely credit, etc any sort of religion [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Science vs. The Bible!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list