Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Science vs. The Bible!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Seth_3515" data-source="post: 6451159" data-attributes="member: 598407"><p>Your statement of describing reality as it is, is true. But you want to believe in one persons description of "reality" every persons view would be described differently which would influence or skew our own view of reality. plus if you want to believe in the Quaran, Book of the Dead, then your theory would also be saying what aristotle, sacrotese, and others wrote... which described "reality" their reality was the earth was flat and the sun revovled around us, but science proved both wrong. your theory sir is flawe.. the bible is not special, the quaran is not special, the book of the dead is not special. they are special in proof of human stupidity.. We have conflict of science vs religion because the religous are too blinded by there faith in their book that describes reality of thousands of years ago to really see the that reality changes...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Seth_3515, post: 6451159, member: 598407"] Your statement of describing reality as it is, is true. But you want to believe in one persons description of "reality" every persons view would be described differently which would influence or skew our own view of reality. plus if you want to believe in the Quaran, Book of the Dead, then your theory would also be saying what aristotle, sacrotese, and others wrote... which described "reality" their reality was the earth was flat and the sun revovled around us, but science proved both wrong. your theory sir is flawe.. the bible is not special, the quaran is not special, the book of the dead is not special. they are special in proof of human stupidity.. We have conflict of science vs religion because the religous are too blinded by there faith in their book that describes reality of thousands of years ago to really see the that reality changes... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Science vs. The Bible!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list