Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Science vs. The Bible!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="newusername" data-source="post: 6449628" data-attributes="member: 562064"><p>Sure, we can accept what we've discovered certain things about the natural world and that there was some sort of being that was behind it all. In that sense, science and god are completely compatible.</p><p></p><p>When religion begins to make specific claims about the natural world that are directly opposed to what the best evidence indicates, then there is a contradiction between science and that specific religious claim. There, I will go with the evidence over what I consider to be a very unreliable account.</p><p></p><p>One question I would pose to you: is the burden of proof on someone to prove that a claim is false, or for the claim to be proven as true?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="newusername, post: 6449628, member: 562064"] Sure, we can accept what we've discovered certain things about the natural world and that there was some sort of being that was behind it all. In that sense, science and god are completely compatible. When religion begins to make specific claims about the natural world that are directly opposed to what the best evidence indicates, then there is a contradiction between science and that specific religious claim. There, I will go with the evidence over what I consider to be a very unreliable account. One question I would pose to you: is the burden of proof on someone to prove that a claim is false, or for the claim to be proven as true? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
Science vs. The Bible!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list