rules

[AlterEgo99 5,000+ posts]

For a few days? Yes. For a week? Maybe.

For 20+ days? Nope.

Can't justify it. And once again; Why has he failed to ban anyone else for the same "offense"? Slappin's sig wasn't even that oversized in the first place.

^This

 

[memphisguy87 10+ year member]

poast

 

[MikeofTulsa Moderator]

If there is a fucking problem with sig size why don't "they" (GOOB) fix it in the settings like the no links thing???

lol

after reading this thread, im quite interested to get an answer to this question since Still has posted numerous times but has been completely overlooking/ignoring this question. answer it.

probably because he's the only one that was an *** about it. i dont think 20 days was warranted. For the most part though, worst has done a good job as a mod. he's still young.

 

[Horsemanwill 10+ year member]

can anyone link me to the sigs rule? i'm not finding it anywhere

anyone?

 

[Annnarbor84 5,000+ posts]

lol


probably because he's the only one that was an *** about it. i dont think 20 days was warranted. For the most part though, worst has done a good job as a mod. he's still a child.

Yep

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

Lets label the mods like this.
Worst=amateur

K&M=ma homie

Ramos=ma secondary homie

Worst=terrible mod

and last but definetely least,

Worst=**** *** shitty *** mod who bans people for "oversized SIGS"

You put another oversized sig up and we will see who gets banned again.

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

after reading this thread, im quite interested to get an answer to this question since Still has posted numerous times but has been completely overlooking/ignoring this question. answer it.

There is only 1 other person with an oversized sig and he has been warned. His ban will arrive tomorrow when i get back from chillin with my soon to be gf if his sig isnt changed.

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

And i tell ya what, if you want to keep complaining about vacations, its just proving that you have no life other than this forum. I havnt seen this many bitches since i went to a redskins vs. eagles game. You guys are just plain stupid.

 

[Annnarbor84 5,000+ posts]

And i tell ya what, if you want to keep complaining about vacations, its just proving that you have no life other than this forum. I havnt seen this many bitches since i went to a redskins vs. eagles game. You guys are just plain stupid.

You would bitch and whine too if the shoe was on the other foot. No one likes to get banned no matter how long, unless they are intentionally doing something to get banned.....

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

You would bitch and whine too if the shoe was on the other foot. No one likes to get banned no matter how long, unless they are intentionally doing something to get banned.....

The shoe has been on the other foot. I was banned for the over sized avatar thing thanks to Dbfan and ive been banned by Randy Savage multiple times because he felt like it.

 

[Annnarbor84 5,000+ posts]

The shoe has been on the other foot. I was banned for the over sized avatar thing thanks to Dbfan and ive been banned by Randy Savage multiple times because he felt like it.

So its time to get even?

 

[Johnny Law.Lulz 5,000+ posts]

Actually, Worst asked him to change it, and he refused.
Insubordination = banz //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

Just sayin'.

If anything, Slappin was testing him to see if he would ban him or not. If Worst didn't ban him, it would just show that everyone can do whatever they want on here. Worst didn't put up with that shit, and extended the pimp hand. Ban deserved. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

This.

He did nothing to justify a month long ban. And once again; Several guys have large sigs. Why has worst neglected to single out a single one of those people? It's because he had a personal vendetta against the person he banned.
The guy's a bad moderator. That's a fact...

Wrong, i didnt have a vendetta against slappin, i was cool with him until he acted his *** out when i politely asked him to change his signature. Only one other person has a large signature at this time that i have seen ( lazyrider ) and as you can tell by his thread, the issue has come up. He isnt acting an *** so ive given him lee-way in changing it and if he doesnt he will recieve a shorter ban for not being an ***.

anyone can link me to the sigs rule?

The sig rule is like the expanding clause on the constitution, mods can govern as we see fit when an issue comes up that is not specifically stated in the rules for the good of the site.

So its time to get even?

Wrong, its time to do my job. Im not putting large sigs in peoples shit just to ban them.

 

[LazyRider 10+ year member]

And i tell ya what, if you want to keep complaining about vacations, its just proving that you have no life other than this forum. I havnt seen this many bitches since i went to a redskins vs. eagles game. You guys are just plain stupid.

I feel quite the opposite. You're so obsessed with my sig it's getting kind of ridiculous. You're trying to make an example out of me and it's not going to happen. If my sig was offensive or I was getting complaints about it or intentionally breaking the rules I could agree with you. I didn't complain when I got banned for posting **** because I knew I was wrong for it. But now all this banning people just because you want to makes this place feel like CACO and SMD

 

[Slappin azz]

You put another oversized sig up and we will see who gets banned again.

I bet you feel so tough and strong being a moderator. Thats my boy.

 

[Horsemanwill 10+ year member]

The sig rule is like the expanding clause on the constitution, mods can govern as we see fit when an issue comes up that is not specifically stated in the rules for the good of the site.

but if its like the constitution then there's at least something to base it off of..... so your telling me that there IS NO sig rule written down. and its just something that is being used as see fit by the powers to be?