Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
RL-P sealed vs ported
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kusan_31" data-source="post: 1740844" data-attributes="member: 562634"><p>i myself prefered sealed. my ported box @ 28hz had great sq, caught all the frequencies accurately, but once it got to my tuning, it would really* unload.</p><p></p><p>imo, it all comes down to what kind of music you usually listen to.</p><p></p><p>i mostly listen to music with very complex basslines so i opt for sealed. however, i do switch boxes occaisonally when im in the mood to really bump =P</p><p></p><p>as far as watts go, i ran my 15" with 600 watts rms and it was loud enough for me. got a 141.5db on the TL (playing music, not test tones) and it really tore up the rear door latch on my explorer.. 800 rms was as high as i went - the extra watts didnt really make a big enough difference for me. this was on a stock electrical system with no sound dampening.</p><p></p><p>hope this helps!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kusan_31, post: 1740844, member: 562634"] i myself prefered sealed. my ported box @ 28hz had great sq, caught all the frequencies accurately, but once it got to my tuning, it would really* unload. imo, it all comes down to what kind of music you usually listen to. i mostly listen to music with very complex basslines so i opt for sealed. however, i do switch boxes occaisonally when im in the mood to really bump =P as far as watts go, i ran my 15" with 600 watts rms and it was loud enough for me. got a 141.5db on the TL (playing music, not test tones) and it really tore up the rear door latch on my explorer.. 800 rms was as high as i went - the extra watts didnt really make a big enough difference for me. this was on a stock electrical system with no sound dampening. hope this helps! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
RL-P sealed vs ported
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list