Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
CarAudio.com Classifieds
Miscellaneous Classifieds
Supporting Vendors
Supporting Vendors <font color="#ff9900">*NEW*</fo
<b>Sundown Audio</b>
Re vs sundown
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="A_Contraptions" data-source="post: 8458860" data-attributes="member: 667466"><p>sean is a character. leave it at that</p><p></p><p></p><p>well, lets not stray from what you said. you didn't say there wasn't anything new tech wise, you said it has nothing really going for it.</p><p></p><p>starting with the topology of the motor, that's not a standard arrangement in which the flux path has one loop equating to one gap, this has 2. I call it a floating gap. the bottom gap is apposed to the top and the coils run in a push/pull formation. when one coil winding leaves one gap and begins to enter another, a breaking occurs by the opposed flux path being opposite polarity of the originated gap thus keeping it from over travel and mechanical damage. not that I see that happening anyways considering the spider diameter is larger then the standard 8" and 10" (there 12" due to the 5" coil with very healthy progressive roll)</p><p></p><p>the coil its self surpasses round wound or flat wound via edge wound method. this is more efficient when it comes to maximum coil density without causing excess air pockets between layers and increase inductance from the layers interaction with the core.</p><p></p><p>the coil is also ceramic toughened with a thicker then standard coil former. this helps with heat and structural integrity.</p><p></p><p>the coil is single 1 ohm (there wired internally together) yet theres two sets of leads. this is common SQ practice to keep the stresses and weights even on the spider. it costs more to do but pays off in the klippel testing.</p><p></p><p>the frame acts as a heat sink as does the above and below gaps structures. they also reduce modulation.</p><p></p><p>the cone is more or less a rohacell copy. very strong yet very light. this helps with accurate tonal reproduction under high excursion.</p><p></p><p>and the 19" portion, that helps make it a true 18" cone in terms of area. not perfect but helps. im sure it was also done for proprietary reasons for recone prevention outside of Rockford. id rebuild it with an adapter my self</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="A_Contraptions, post: 8458860, member: 667466"] sean is a character. leave it at that well, lets not stray from what you said. you didn't say there wasn't anything new tech wise, you said it has nothing really going for it. starting with the topology of the motor, that's not a standard arrangement in which the flux path has one loop equating to one gap, this has 2. I call it a floating gap. the bottom gap is apposed to the top and the coils run in a push/pull formation. when one coil winding leaves one gap and begins to enter another, a breaking occurs by the opposed flux path being opposite polarity of the originated gap thus keeping it from over travel and mechanical damage. not that I see that happening anyways considering the spider diameter is larger then the standard 8" and 10" (there 12" due to the 5" coil with very healthy progressive roll) the coil its self surpasses round wound or flat wound via edge wound method. this is more efficient when it comes to maximum coil density without causing excess air pockets between layers and increase inductance from the layers interaction with the core. the coil is also ceramic toughened with a thicker then standard coil former. this helps with heat and structural integrity. the coil is single 1 ohm (there wired internally together) yet theres two sets of leads. this is common SQ practice to keep the stresses and weights even on the spider. it costs more to do but pays off in the klippel testing. the frame acts as a heat sink as does the above and below gaps structures. they also reduce modulation. the cone is more or less a rohacell copy. very strong yet very light. this helps with accurate tonal reproduction under high excursion. and the 19" portion, that helps make it a true 18" cone in terms of area. not perfect but helps. im sure it was also done for proprietary reasons for recone prevention outside of Rockford. id rebuild it with an adapter my self [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
CarAudio.com Classifieds
Miscellaneous Classifieds
Supporting Vendors
Supporting Vendors <font color="#ff9900">*NEW*</fo
<b>Sundown Audio</b>
Re vs sundown
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh