RE SX's or Kicker CVX 15s

[Walled_Taurus 10+ year member]

Of these 2 or other brands what would you guys choose, there gonna see anywhere from 4k to 8k havn't decided on sub amp yet.

Let me know what you guys think?

Click to read more...

 

[the Answer 10+ year member]

i have had cvr's and i currently have a SX. RE makes way better subs than kicker.

 

[kfx450r 10+ year member]

i have had cvr's and i currently have a SX. RE makes way better subs than kicker.

CVXs are way better than CVRs but id have to agree, RE makes a better product.

 

[Walled_Taurus 10+ year member]

Yah cvr's are a cheap budget sub. So 2 votes RE

 

[SPLaudio 5,000+ posts]

cvx= 2.375 4 layer coil, sx= 3" 8 layer vc. the sx will handle about double or more real world power over the cvx. they really arent in the same class. SX all day!

 

[ty_houston 10+ year member]

not even fair, the sx is in the same class as the ascendant audio havoc..fi q...very good sql driver, they are rated at 1000 watts rms, but I know guys running double that for daily(I wouldn't do that)

 

[CobraStang98 10+ year member]

Of these 2 or other brands what would you guys choose, there gonna see anywhere from 4k to 8k havn't decided on sub amp yet.
Let me know what you guys think?

4k and 8k watts are a big difference and the subs you're choosing/amount of woofers depends heavily on power.

Out of the 2 I'd run SXs.. I've run a bunch of different sizes of SXs in the past and loved all of them. CVXs are good woofers but SXs are of a better build quality and should take more power.

 

[thericanballer 10+ year member]

re sx > kicker cvx. re wins

 

[thegreatestpenn 5,000+ posts]

CVX's are pretty laid back subs while the RE SX is in your face. So considering you are getting 15's I'm sure u want in your face bass so the SX is the way to go

 

[CobraStang98 10+ year member]

CVX's are pretty laid back subs while the RE SX is in your face. So considering you are getting 15's I'm sure u want in your face bass so the SX is the way to go

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif:crap:

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wow.gif.23d729408e9177caa2a0ed6a2ba6588e.gif

 

[Mr. C 10+ year member]

Sx's by a long shot.

And not just because I own some. No comparison. A pair of CVX's on that power will see the magic smoke.

 

[WOT]

4k and 8k watts are a big difference and the subs you're choosing/amount of woofers depends heavily on power.
Out of the 2 I'd run SXs.. I've run a bunch of different sizes of SXs in the past and loved all of them. CVXs are good woofers but SXs are of a better build quality and should take more power.

Hes lying, he hasnt run ****, doesnt own the cars in his sig, dont take this advice seriously

 

[ruel1977 10+ year member]

maybe L7 is a close call compared to SX.. but SX still wins against L7...

 

[SomeDonnieDude 10+ year member]

not even fair, the sx is in the same class as the ascendant audio havoc..fi q...very good sql driver, they are rated at 1000 watts rms, but I know guys running double that for daily(I wouldn't do that)

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif How the heck do you compare an Fi Q to an RE SX??? Just because they are rated the same RMS value doesn't mean they are comparable.