Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
"You Black People Were Lucky To Be Our Slaves"-Patrick Buchanan
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tsenfw" data-source="post: 4224528" data-attributes="member: 581534"><p>Hmm yeah patent numbers is a good start. I didn't say the discussion was illegitabmate, just that you guys were taking liberties with your assumptions.</p><p></p><p>I wasn't referring to the merits of owning slaves as increasing wealth, I am directly addressing the time saving to slave owners. Basically, I believe they would have been sitting on their ***** anyways. In what way would slaves make more time for the wealthy? Would these owners have been working in the fields themselves if they didn't have slaves? Hell no! lol. They would have hired more expensive but still "cheap" labor. It's not like most of the people of the time in America were wealthy. Look it the shitty pay that came later in time to US factory workers. There was abundant cheap labor in the US, just not as cheap as slave labor.</p><p></p><p>So without slave labor the wealthy wouldn't have been as wealthy but they certainly wouldn't have been doing any manual labor themselves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tsenfw, post: 4224528, member: 581534"] Hmm yeah patent numbers is a good start. I didn't say the discussion was illegitabmate, just that you guys were taking liberties with your assumptions. I wasn't referring to the merits of owning slaves as increasing wealth, I am directly addressing the time saving to slave owners. Basically, I believe they would have been sitting on their ***** anyways. In what way would slaves make more time for the wealthy? Would these owners have been working in the fields themselves if they didn't have slaves? Hell no! lol. They would have hired more expensive but still "cheap" labor. It's not like most of the people of the time in America were wealthy. Look it the shitty pay that came later in time to US factory workers. There was abundant cheap labor in the US, just not as cheap as slave labor. So without slave labor the wealthy wouldn't have been as wealthy but they certainly wouldn't have been doing any manual labor themselves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
"You Black People Were Lucky To Be Our Slaves"-Patrick Buchanan
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list