Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Amplifiers
Power Acoustik Rz1-2300D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PPI_GUY" data-source="post: 8635070" data-attributes="member: 618066"><p>Yeah, the Razor 2300 is the same amp as the PPI i650.1 and the SS PN1.650 just a different heat sink. Looks like your results are pretty much inline with what Sonic Electronix got as well. Who knows about the sketchy power claims? Just goofy un-needed marketing BS from their parent company Epsilon.</p><p></p><p>I will definitely be interested in seeing your results of the PN1000.1 on the dyno. Been thinking of grabbing one of the PPI Ion versions. I'm gonna guess around 925 watts.</p><p></p><p>BTW, there's a thread on DIYMA about the differences between the PPI Ion and Phantom series with some opinions about the Ion's from people who say they've used them. Reviews seem to be widely varied. Some say the multi-channels introduce noise into the system while some say they haven't heard anything. Totally expected from such a mass-produced amp I guess.</p><p></p><p>Apparent Dual has mini class D series that use the same internals.</p><p></p><p>Keep up the good work with your dyno vids. Very helpful info.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PPI_GUY, post: 8635070, member: 618066"] Yeah, the Razor 2300 is the same amp as the PPI i650.1 and the SS PN1.650 just a different heat sink. Looks like your results are pretty much inline with what Sonic Electronix got as well. Who knows about the sketchy power claims? Just goofy un-needed marketing BS from their parent company Epsilon. I will definitely be interested in seeing your results of the PN1000.1 on the dyno. Been thinking of grabbing one of the PPI Ion versions. I'm gonna guess around 925 watts. BTW, there's a thread on DIYMA about the differences between the PPI Ion and Phantom series with some opinions about the Ion's from people who say they've used them. Reviews seem to be widely varied. Some say the multi-channels introduce noise into the system while some say they haven't heard anything. Totally expected from such a mass-produced amp I guess. Apparent Dual has mini class D series that use the same internals. Keep up the good work with your dyno vids. Very helpful info. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Amplifiers
Power Acoustik Rz1-2300D
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh