Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
porting mid-bass question on port size
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tRidiot" data-source="post: 3693160" data-attributes="member: 569830"><p>There is a free box design program called WinISD that will help you model a driver's performance in various sized enclosures. I think it's linearteam.org or something like that.</p><p></p><p>However, I would simply email CDT and see if you can get some tech help on the issue. I am not telling you that you need to go with sealed and shouldn't port them... in fact, I think porting would be a great thing for midbass drivers, provided you have a good enough high-pass filter on them. I've considered it for mine.</p><p></p><p>From what you've said, though, worrying about "low end" performance seems a bit... odd to me when you're planning on crossing them over at 100Hz. There is no low end above 100Hz.</p><p></p><p>If you can get .45 or .5 cubes of airspace, then you can still get those things tuned down to 60 or 70 Hz easily, I would assume, and believe me, that is WORLDS better than crossing several-hundred dollar components at 100Hz. Ugh.</p><p></p><p>Up-front bass FTMFW!</p><p></p><p>The .3 sealed box response on that .pdf is probably gonna get a bit of a low-end bump from the car's cabin gain, son don't look at that graph and think it's automatically gonna be wimpy below 100Hz, where it begins to roll off. You could very well go with a .3-.4 sealed box and have those things HAMMERING at 80 or even 60Hz. You might be really really surprised....</p><p></p><p>What kind of power are you going to be running to these? I assume you're going 3-way active front, since you're only running them up to 350Hz?</p><p></p><p>Email CDT and tell 'em your dilemma... not QUITE enough airspace for 50Hz tuning, but still want to port. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p><p></p><p>Seriously, though, let me know how they work out in these enclosures, I've got a buddy with these exact drivers who is wanting to build enclosures for his, wondering how they're going to sound. Your experiences could be greatly motivating to him. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tRidiot, post: 3693160, member: 569830"] There is a free box design program called WinISD that will help you model a driver's performance in various sized enclosures. I think it's linearteam.org or something like that. However, I would simply email CDT and see if you can get some tech help on the issue. I am not telling you that you need to go with sealed and shouldn't port them... in fact, I think porting would be a great thing for midbass drivers, provided you have a good enough high-pass filter on them. I've considered it for mine. From what you've said, though, worrying about "low end" performance seems a bit... odd to me when you're planning on crossing them over at 100Hz. There is no low end above 100Hz. If you can get .45 or .5 cubes of airspace, then you can still get those things tuned down to 60 or 70 Hz easily, I would assume, and believe me, that is WORLDS better than crossing several-hundred dollar components at 100Hz. Ugh. Up-front bass FTMFW! The .3 sealed box response on that .pdf is probably gonna get a bit of a low-end bump from the car's cabin gain, son don't look at that graph and think it's automatically gonna be wimpy below 100Hz, where it begins to roll off. You could very well go with a .3-.4 sealed box and have those things HAMMERING at 80 or even 60Hz. You might be really really surprised.... What kind of power are you going to be running to these? I assume you're going 3-way active front, since you're only running them up to 350Hz? Email CDT and tell 'em your dilemma... not QUITE enough airspace for 50Hz tuning, but still want to port. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] Seriously, though, let me know how they work out in these enclosures, I've got a buddy with these exact drivers who is wanting to build enclosures for his, wondering how they're going to sound. Your experiences could be greatly motivating to him. [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
porting mid-bass question on port size
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list