Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
ported trunk not box..?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="entropie" data-source="post: 3974791" data-attributes="member: 572907"><p>yep. basically the way i figure it is the trunk is essentially the second chamber of the enclosure. based on reading this <a href="http://www.ozaudio.com/docs/Bandpass_Enclosures.pdf" target="_blank">pdf file</a>, "as the ported chamber increases in internal volume the system becomes more efficient." however, as that happens "the bandwidth becomes thinner."</p><p></p><p>with my car, a '95 bmw m3, the trunk is very tight and i believe my alumapro bp-10 suffers from the "one note" bass mentioned in the pdf file. now, i understand to gain the exact appropriate port length would be impossible due to the fact the trunk is <strong>not</strong> sealed blah, blah... but my question is: does anyone believe the use of ports hanging from the rear deck (possibly tappered ones) would improve the range of bass.</p><p></p><p>fyi, with the seats down, the bass notes take on a new persona. with the seats up the bass gets greatly silenced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="entropie, post: 3974791, member: 572907"] yep. basically the way i figure it is the trunk is essentially the second chamber of the enclosure. based on reading this [URL="http://www.ozaudio.com/docs/Bandpass_Enclosures.pdf"]pdf file[/URL], "as the ported chamber increases in internal volume the system becomes more efficient." however, as that happens "the bandwidth becomes thinner." with my car, a '95 bmw m3, the trunk is very tight and i believe my alumapro bp-10 suffers from the "one note" bass mentioned in the pdf file. now, i understand to gain the exact appropriate port length would be impossible due to the fact the trunk is [B]not[/B] sealed blah, blah... but my question is: does anyone believe the use of ports hanging from the rear deck (possibly tappered ones) would improve the range of bass. fyi, with the seats down, the bass notes take on a new persona. with the seats up the bass gets greatly silenced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
ported trunk not box..?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list