Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
PG V10S Ryval VS. Coustic US-CX10-04
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RAM_Designs" data-source="post: 6459168" data-attributes="member: 566575"><p>What scares you about it? They did like a lot of manufacturers and just listed the fs as the low spot of the frequency range.</p><p></p><p>OP, Coustic is made by the same father company(Mitek) that makes Xtant and MTX as well. The high qts of the Coustic should steer you away from using a ported box with them. The PG's should fair better in a ported alignment, and the Coustic <em>should</em> work better sealed(more efficient, higher xmax, higher qts, lower ebp). Although I haven't modeled them up yet, I'm just going off of my first impressions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RAM_Designs, post: 6459168, member: 566575"] What scares you about it? They did like a lot of manufacturers and just listed the fs as the low spot of the frequency range. OP, Coustic is made by the same father company(Mitek) that makes Xtant and MTX as well. The high qts of the Coustic should steer you away from using a ported box with them. The PG's should fair better in a ported alignment, and the Coustic [I]should[/I] work better sealed(more efficient, higher xmax, higher qts, lower ebp). Although I haven't modeled them up yet, I'm just going off of my first impressions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
PG V10S Ryval VS. Coustic US-CX10-04
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh