Petition to bring back the Mag v3

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

God you are such a faggot.

This is my last reply.

Good luck with the petition bose, its highly improbable but well worth the try.

Love you too there is an ignore button. make use of it asshat

 

[bose301s 5,000+ posts]

God you are such a faggot.

This is my last reply.

Good luck with the petition bose, its highly improbable but well worth the try.

He doesn't bother me, again, he nut hugs Mach 5, which while great drivers, they are nothing special. SI has proven itself over the years and that will continue, and anything 02parkave does won't affect it.

 

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

He doesn't bother me, again, he nut hugs Mach 5, which while great drivers, they are nothing special. SI has proven itself over the years and that will continue, and anything 02parkave does won't affect it.

lol.. si isnt anything special either... seems we are at a crossroads

 

[Electrodynamic 10+ year member]

Hicks.

 

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

I did pose a legitimate question to nick, and i really would like the answer, assuming nick didnt burn any bridges (i dont know, but a smart businessman wouldnt) why doesnt he merely go back to scott and get em oem'd there? im sure scott would be happy for the business, and those of you clamoring for the "true" (//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif) mag (it seems to be a few of you) would be happy... could maybe even get a slightly lower price tag on em, as i know scotts prices arent that bad at all!

 

[bose301s 5,000+ posts]

lol.. si isnt anything special either... seems we are at a crossroads

At the very least SI has done some innovation with the newest line of subs whereas Mach 5 hasn't, good products, just nothing innovative.

 

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

At the very least SI has done some innovation with the newest line of subs whereas Mach 5 hasn't, good products, just nothing innovative.

What innovation? xbl^2 isnt new. motor in frame isnt new.... what innovation has he done bose?

 

[BLD 25 10+ year member]

somewhat OT, but was the previous BM destjl? I was wondering because it looked nearly identical to my destjl made e12k, but electrodynamic said they were completely different.

 

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

somewhat OT, but was the previous BM destjl? I was wondering because it looked nearly identical to my destjl made e12k, but electrodynamic said they were completely different.

believe it was. however, im sure it was vastly different than teh e12k....the mag would have been a much better driver.

 

[ultimate157 5,000+ posts]

If Nick were to go to Scott @ FI for manufacturing the v3 Mag, whats to say people aren't going to start calling it a Q? It very well could be the same driver, but they could also make changes to the materials... Still the question would be raised nonetheless.

 

[bose301s 5,000+ posts]

What innovation? xbl^2 isnt new. motor in frame isnt new.... what innovation has he done bose?

Innovation does not mean new, it means taking older tech and using it in new ways. But maybe innovation was a somewhat incorrect word choice. He tried something different, he took a low distortion motor topology, put it n shallow baskets that need very little airspace. Overall it is something very different from the same old things that other companies have been doing for the past few years.

 

[bose301s 5,000+ posts]

somewhat OT, but was the previous BM destjl? I was wondering because it looked nearly identical to my destjl made e12k, but electrodynamic said they were completely different.

It looked similar in the fact the slug sizes and basket were the same, other than that there was not a single similarity.

 

[bose301s 5,000+ posts]

believe it was. however, im sure it was vastly different than teh e12k....the mag would have been a much better driver.

Wrong again, the BM was not destjl.

 

[wu501 10+ year member]

wow...another pointless SI thread. You guys argue like a bunch of school girls. There are tons of companies out there. Buy what you like and who gives a shit about the others.

 

[02parkave 5,000+ posts]

If Nick were to go to Scott @ FI for manufacturing the v3 Mag, whats to say people aren't going to start calling it a Q? It very well could be the same driver, but they could also make changes to the materials... Still the question would be raised nonetheless.

top and bottom plates are different, gap is different. its not even close to a q. (and it still got compared to teh q before hand)

Innovation does not mean new, it means taking older tech and using it in new ways. But maybe innovation was a somewhat incorrect word choice. He tried something different, he took a low distortion motor topology, put it n shallow baskets that need very little airspace. Overall it is something very different from the same old things that other companies have been doing for the past few years.

he did that just making sure we were on the same page.. not innovative. I actually discussed with mark the possibility of bringing out an xbl driver (as jinllinda is one of the few, if not the only overseas bh's liscenced to use the trech) and he couldnt justify the cost of bringing the driver out (remember, this isnt close to his main business), with unknown need/desire on the market. it would get tiring bringing product after product out with lots clamoring for them, and few actually ponying up...