Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bass_lover1" data-source="post: 3464947" data-attributes="member: 555256">My buddy uses the XXV, and I have the 880, unfortunately I haven&#039;t spent enough time w/ the XXV to compare the two directly, but I have used my 880 for over a year.The Auto TA/EQ feature works very well.&nbsp; I did everything in my ability to get the TA perfect, but compared to Auto, it was a night and day difference, the auto was so much better.The Auto EQ on the other hand, I could live w/o, it overly bloated the midbass region so I turned that part off and just eq&#039;d it my self to my tastes.Also, a few things that people don&#039;t mention, not only is there the L/R independent eq, but you can also independently adjust the crossover points, slopes, phase, and level between the front stage, IMO it would take a good amount of time to get that dialed in perfectly, but it&#039;s another feature the 880 has that I&#039;m pretty sure the XXV does not.Hope this helps some.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bass_lover1, post: 3464947, member: 555256"] My buddy uses the XXV, and I have the 880, unfortunately I haven't spent enough time w/ the XXV to compare the two directly, but I have used my 880 for over a year. The Auto TA/EQ feature works very well. I did everything in my ability to get the TA perfect, but compared to Auto, it was a night and day difference, the auto was so much better. The Auto EQ on the other hand, I could live w/o, it overly bloated the midbass region so I turned that part off and just eq'd it my self to my tastes. Also, a few things that people don't mention, not only is there the L/R independent eq, but you can also independently adjust the crossover points, slopes, phase, and level between the front stage, IMO it would take a good amount of time to get that dialed in perfectly, but it's another feature the 880 has that I'm pretty sure the XXV does not. Hope this helps some. [/QUOTE]

Verification