Lets touch a couple things on the way out..
We aren't in Iraq for illegal missles, so
missile debris in Kuwait the items fired from Iraq were not sparklers as Savant thought but instead were...illegal scud missiles. Tsk..tsk...tsk...those pesky facts keep coming back to the top.
doesn't justify the loss of life going on, if you ask me. We claimed to be going in for WOMD, none found yet.. and chem/bio weaps.. none found yet.. though, you say
Chemical sensors going off
which actaully means NOTHING.. sensors are set to go off for any of MANY reasons, not just because there are deadly chemicals in the air. When these sensors go off, we do tests, and if any of them showed 'dangerous chemicals that could be construde as Chemical weapons', I"m sure we would hear about it.. the sensors go off, nothing found.. that is NOT proof.. oh, wait, by your thinking it is.. sorry.. my bad.
Iraqi escapees telling tales of atrocities which rival Nazi Germany
noone said the Iraqi people weren't suffering, yet you keep beating on points like that.. why? oh, cause you don't have anything based on our war motivations to support your point.. that's right..
not WOMD, so not relavant to why we invaded, yet you keep bringing this up too.. see above..
Illegal missiles found by UN inspectors
YES.. DURING the inspections BEFORE the war, missles that were being DESTROYED before Bush said "we are comming in no matter what", then the destruction stopped.. gee, wonder why..
Violating 18 UN resolutions
Odd, I'm pretty sure it's only 17 (only, I know).. we never bothered to get a reasonable 'final' resolution put in place that would have clear terms and not filled with legaleez bullshit.. give dates and times for deadlines, and stipulations for getting inspectors where they want.. na.. the U.S. doesn't have to do that, we can just stroll in.. cause diplomatic attempts failed.. why? WE WALKED AWAY FROM THE TABLE AGAIN.. *shrug*
Refuses any facts that don't back up his cow dung, and the facts rarely do. Because he spreads false information as truth
I only refuse 'statements' from someone that claims they are proof when they clearly have no sources to show proof. I could care less if 'proof' supports my point or someone elses, if someone else is 'right', I will adjust my thinking.. that's called being openminded .. I perfer to have informed opinions, why does it offend you so much that your opinions aren't based on proof (uninformed opinions) and I won't let you convice me you have merrit without basis?
Give it up dude before you are stripped of the last vestiges of intellectual dignity you have. You are wrong and know it and are just too much a egotist to say it.
Yet, I was perfectly willing to admit being wrong about Saudi-Arabi being our #1 supplier of oil and even verified (and supplied proof for your argument if you recall) that Canada was #1 (not that that was a point that had anything to do with the main points, nor was it even in response to a post of yours, and never mind I qualified it as something I was recalling from memory and it might be wrong).. and I admitted the entire Clinton being a criminal thing based on your links, yet that doesn't count either, right? I'm too egotistical.. You are soooo correct..
That one I'll give you. We were guilty of assuming that Canada was enforcing it's own immigration laws and adhering to treaties between us pertaining to immigration laws...which is why we have such a large open border.
Am I missing something here? Didn't the pilots get liscenses from US offices? Didn't the US let these people meander around and get training and liscenses and such ? If they did that by comming in from Canada, I'm not sure that's a point.. There are plenty of illegal aliens in this country that come in from Florida and across Mexico.. If there was something significant about the Canada connection, I've not heard it .. I'd ask for a link so I could become informed, but I don't want to have to bounce back and forth for 30 posts to get it..
anyway, there is nothing anyone can do for you. you insist on being the superior intellect (despite your obvious lack of being able to process information, look up the difinition of intellect.. as I've pointed out in may other posts.. too many.. you sucked a lot of info into your head from books, but lack the tools (intellect) to process it for any good.. my condolences)
with this, I'm done responding to you (I know, I've said it before.. but after saying the SAME things this last round as the round before, I'm becomming painfully aware that you are just too dense to help..) I'll have to resolve to letting you flame me a few more times on the way out with more drivel that doesn't actually show anything of substance to debunk my positions or opinions, nor will you learn to provide what's accepted by intellectual circles as good info for a debate, you will continue to use faulty logic and misleading and out of context statements and try to associate your opponent to things that stirr up negative emotional feelings in the readers to help diminish your oponent when you have no other means to get ahead..
peace.. actually.. no, not to you.. you obviously have no concept of peace since you think it reasonable that we went into Iraq instead finding a peaceful resolution..