Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 4930905" data-attributes="member: 549629">But you have no way to prove your method/material chosen will perform better than his butyl based preferred material (depending on the application). Fox DOES have a way to prove his stance in this argument however. The science is on his side.Nobody is claiming your deadening job didn&#039;t work, only that it could have and would have worked better had you applied a butyl based mat. Again as I said before, its hard too say if the difference would have even been noticeable to the ***** human senses or not, but the science behind these materials clearly shows the butyl based product is superior, in many ways. If you want to only talk about the adhesion aspect, that&#039;s fine. But there are other factors involved, factors you cannot deny tip in the favor of the butyl products.Glad you guys seem to be engaging in a rational discussion again. Cheers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 4930905, member: 549629"] But you have no way to prove your method/material chosen will perform better than his butyl based preferred material (depending on the application). Fox DOES have a way to prove his stance in this argument however. The science is on his side. Nobody is claiming your deadening job didn't work, only that it could have and would have worked better had you applied a butyl based mat. Again as I said before, its hard too say if the difference would have even been noticeable to the ***** human senses or not, but the science behind these materials clearly shows the butyl based product is superior, in many ways. If you want to only talk about the adhesion aspect, that's fine. But there are other factors involved, factors you cannot deny tip in the favor of the butyl products. Glad you guys seem to be engaging in a rational discussion again. Cheers. [/QUOTE]

Verification