Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Okay. Fine Zane. Point Taken. Would you mind answering a couple other questions???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mrray13" data-source="post: 5871" data-attributes="member: 540942"><p>i disagree that because you have more xmas and less cone that it don't mean anything. the idea is to move air, correct? ok, then xmas moves air as well as cone area.example: you have a 15" woofer w/xmas of say .05": i have a 10" woofer but the xmas 1.25"(just an example). so your woofer is apx 1.5 times larger in cone area, yet mine has a little over twice the xmas. in theory i am moving as much air just not reproducing the lower freqs as well. is that not why a 8" sub has to move 2/3 farther to move the same amount as a 12"? IMO xmas has much to do with it as cone area.</p><p></p><p>vmax? the amount a sub moves into the basket? if that is correct, then wouldn't box design have something to do with how well that adds to the system?</p><p></p><p>power handling: while your correct as to the jl having to be way underrated to compete with your L7's in that department, which is the most efficient sub? if the jl has a higher sensitivity rating then it wouldn't need all the power to get as loud. that is something you haven't added to the equation.</p><p></p><p>if i'm wrong about any of the above, feel free to correct me. i can't do anything but learn!!</p><p></p><p>one other quick note... good luck at your school soundoff. you should compete pretty well</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mrray13, post: 5871, member: 540942"] i disagree that because you have more xmas and less cone that it don't mean anything. the idea is to move air, correct? ok, then xmas moves air as well as cone area.example: you have a 15" woofer w/xmas of say .05": i have a 10" woofer but the xmas 1.25"(just an example). so your woofer is apx 1.5 times larger in cone area, yet mine has a little over twice the xmas. in theory i am moving as much air just not reproducing the lower freqs as well. is that not why a 8" sub has to move 2/3 farther to move the same amount as a 12"? IMO xmas has much to do with it as cone area. vmax? the amount a sub moves into the basket? if that is correct, then wouldn't box design have something to do with how well that adds to the system? power handling: while your correct as to the jl having to be way underrated to compete with your L7's in that department, which is the most efficient sub? if the jl has a higher sensitivity rating then it wouldn't need all the power to get as loud. that is something you haven't added to the equation. if i'm wrong about any of the above, feel free to correct me. i can't do anything but learn!! one other quick note... good luck at your school soundoff. you should compete pretty well [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Okay. Fine Zane. Point Taken. Would you mind answering a couple other questions???
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh