Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
now i have a customer ask me too....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HiAmplidude" data-source="post: 1382349" data-attributes="member: 561470"><p>wow... I just punched in those woofs' t/s params and they really need a big enclosure for decent allignment. You could get away with 1.5 cu. ft. ported for EACH sub, tuned to 30 Hz looks so-so.</p><p></p><p>The curve looks not impressive in sealed 1.65 cu. ft. for a Qtc of .707, with a F3 (3dB down) @ 41 Hz. But according to its T/S params, it appears to like a sealed box more, unless you have a crud load of space for an optimal vented enclosure which would be more like 2 cu. ft. or bigger, per EACH woof.</p><p></p><p>After looking at the theoretical response curves and seeing what kind of air space they're comfortable in, I'd, personally, recommend a different woof. But, if he's set on those, they'll at least be able to make some ok boom boom.</p><p></p><p>I guess you could also see if he'd be happy running them isobarak. That'll still maintain the power-handling of the 4 woofs, but will decrease enclosure air space requirements by half.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HiAmplidude, post: 1382349, member: 561470"] wow... I just punched in those woofs' t/s params and they really need a big enclosure for decent allignment. You could get away with 1.5 cu. ft. ported for EACH sub, tuned to 30 Hz looks so-so. The curve looks not impressive in sealed 1.65 cu. ft. for a Qtc of .707, with a F3 (3dB down) @ 41 Hz. But according to its T/S params, it appears to like a sealed box more, unless you have a crud load of space for an optimal vented enclosure which would be more like 2 cu. ft. or bigger, per EACH woof. After looking at the theoretical response curves and seeing what kind of air space they're comfortable in, I'd, personally, recommend a different woof. But, if he's set on those, they'll at least be able to make some ok boom boom. I guess you could also see if he'd be happy running them isobarak. That'll still maintain the power-handling of the 4 woofs, but will decrease enclosure air space requirements by half. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
now i have a customer ask me too....
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list