Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Head Units
Non DSP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Papermaker85" data-source="post: 8511753" data-attributes="member: 572595"><p>well first off the bet ten is fine its more than capable. if your comparing simply the software ease of use and correlating to better or worse i disagree. The tuning options on both units are more than enough if you properly install the speakers. i've heard some of the best sounding cars that used little sound processing. simply by using the correct drivers, axis, placement, power and simple techniques like eliminating comb filtering naturally with driver placement, selection, ideal enclosure and using the drivers natural rolloff to complement the cutoff instead of destroying phase and dampening by just selecting drivers and implementing the xover points decided buy altering slope and Q to try to correct phase issues then having to readjust TA etc.. don't get me wrong when you face challenges of drop speakers in stock locations in leaky doors etc yea having a ton of options is nice. but simply building a proper enclosre for hte midbass and midrange goes a LONG way. the correct axis and height etc is MUCH more effective then 1000 tuning options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Papermaker85, post: 8511753, member: 572595"] well first off the bet ten is fine its more than capable. if your comparing simply the software ease of use and correlating to better or worse i disagree. The tuning options on both units are more than enough if you properly install the speakers. i've heard some of the best sounding cars that used little sound processing. simply by using the correct drivers, axis, placement, power and simple techniques like eliminating comb filtering naturally with driver placement, selection, ideal enclosure and using the drivers natural rolloff to complement the cutoff instead of destroying phase and dampening by just selecting drivers and implementing the xover points decided buy altering slope and Q to try to correct phase issues then having to readjust TA etc.. don't get me wrong when you face challenges of drop speakers in stock locations in leaky doors etc yea having a ton of options is nice. but simply building a proper enclosre for hte midbass and midrange goes a LONG way. the correct axis and height etc is MUCH more effective then 1000 tuning options. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Head Units
Non DSP
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh