Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
No Subs for me?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EFFENDI" data-source="post: 541939" data-attributes="member: 555674"><p>You know audioholic, I am really surprised that you would go to such an effort in order to bring defamation to my name and reputation. I dont feel that I have a bruised ego, in fact quite the opposite is true, I just simply dont understand why you would try so hard to attempt to do so, if anyone is exhibiting a bruised ego here it isnt me. I have much more important things to deal with. I do have a problem with people arguing over a simple misinterpretation and an unwillingness to understand though...</p><p></p><p>The single issue that I have with you is that you went out of your way to make me appear to have done something wrong, considering my wholehearted intent, it was not ever to realize that falsehood.</p><p></p><p>My inital post purposely was vauge, but not incorrect. I will explain.</p><p></p><p>Your first post quoted mine, stating my reccomendation as an 'incorrect' one, in that sense; you purposefully and well-knowingly took my statement out of context in order to further the argument that you had with me regarding whether or not they are actually the same subs. You keep perpetuating your argument that I said they were exactly the same subs in every possible way, when you well know that I <strong>never</strong> said that! In this sense you are perpetuating things because <em>I am simply trying to prove my blamelessness</em>. I honestly beleive that the bulk of the members of this forum carry enough common sense to make the correct assumption based on what it was I first posted, if I am wrong to assume that most of the members here are even minutely intelligent and mature, then I must be in the wrong forum. I never said or intended for you to feel like an "idiot jerk-off", you felt that way on your own.</p><p></p><p>As I clearly stated before, I assumed that the OPs question was asking for suggestions as to which subs fit the same category of the other models he listed, my post was not ever intended for you to debate. My intent was for the original poster to come to his own conclusions based on my reccomendations.</p><p></p><p>Let me remind you that it was not me who first said they are interchangeable, it was you. Additionally, by interchangeable, I assumed that you meant they fit the same criteria to be considered for that same group of similar subs, which "for all intents and purposes (based of those subs from the OPs initial comparison) <strong>are</strong> the same" No it is not a "swap one for another "situation, any basic enthusiast realizes that, Im surprised that you would even bother posting nonsense like that. It is these broad statements and blatant generalizations that you are basing a pointless argument on.</p><p></p><p>I am the bigger man here, at 6' 4" and 265lbs //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif , and more than willing to let this go. I sincerly apologize for insulting your intelligence, but hopefully now that I have illustrated it clearly, I hope that you now finally understand exactly what it was I said.</p><p></p><p>Im done.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EFFENDI, post: 541939, member: 555674"] You know audioholic, I am really surprised that you would go to such an effort in order to bring defamation to my name and reputation. I dont feel that I have a bruised ego, in fact quite the opposite is true, I just simply dont understand why you would try so hard to attempt to do so, if anyone is exhibiting a bruised ego here it isnt me. I have much more important things to deal with. I do have a problem with people arguing over a simple misinterpretation and an unwillingness to understand though... The single issue that I have with you is that you went out of your way to make me appear to have done something wrong, considering my wholehearted intent, it was not ever to realize that falsehood. My inital post purposely was vauge, but not incorrect. I will explain. Your first post quoted mine, stating my reccomendation as an 'incorrect' one, in that sense; you purposefully and well-knowingly took my statement out of context in order to further the argument that you had with me regarding whether or not they are actually the same subs. You keep perpetuating your argument that I said they were exactly the same subs in every possible way, when you well know that I [B]never[/B] said that! In this sense you are perpetuating things because [I]I am simply trying to prove my blamelessness[/I]. I honestly beleive that the bulk of the members of this forum carry enough common sense to make the correct assumption based on what it was I first posted, if I am wrong to assume that most of the members here are even minutely intelligent and mature, then I must be in the wrong forum. I never said or intended for you to feel like an "idiot jerk-off", you felt that way on your own. As I clearly stated before, I assumed that the OPs question was asking for suggestions as to which subs fit the same category of the other models he listed, my post was not ever intended for you to debate. My intent was for the original poster to come to his own conclusions based on my reccomendations. Let me remind you that it was not me who first said they are interchangeable, it was you. Additionally, by interchangeable, I assumed that you meant they fit the same criteria to be considered for that same group of similar subs, which "for all intents and purposes (based of those subs from the OPs initial comparison) [B]are[/B] the same" No it is not a "swap one for another "situation, any basic enthusiast realizes that, Im surprised that you would even bother posting nonsense like that. It is these broad statements and blatant generalizations that you are basing a pointless argument on. I am the bigger man here, at 6' 4" and 265lbs [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] , and more than willing to let this go. I sincerly apologize for insulting your intelligence, but hopefully now that I have illustrated it clearly, I hope that you now finally understand exactly what it was I said. Im done. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
No Subs for me?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
