Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
New SI Mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hundreth" data-source="post: 3364138" data-attributes="member: 556975"><p>The current gen. Nope I wasn't looking for anything exaggerated, its just that the punchy bass was overwhelming compared to the lows, the opposite of flat. I don't know what car you managed to get flat to 20hz with the Mag, but mine wasn't close.. I've had two other subs (Oz ME, TC12) in that car in the same exact install (same box, same amp) and they both managed to sound flatter than the Mag. Its no coincidence either, what my ears heard correlate exactly to what was modeled (53hz F3 w/ .5ish Qtc for Mag, 42hz F3 w/ .8ish Qtc for Oz ME, 31hz F3 w/ .7ish Qtc for TC12.) The Mag isn't bad sealed, its just obvious its geared more towards ported alignments.</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong, I really did like the Mag... It got louder than the other two and tonally, it was basically perfect. I really would love to hear what you claim with my own ears though, must have had some tremendous cabin gain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hundreth, post: 3364138, member: 556975"] The current gen. Nope I wasn't looking for anything exaggerated, its just that the punchy bass was overwhelming compared to the lows, the opposite of flat. I don't know what car you managed to get flat to 20hz with the Mag, but mine wasn't close.. I've had two other subs (Oz ME, TC12) in that car in the same exact install (same box, same amp) and they both managed to sound flatter than the Mag. Its no coincidence either, what my ears heard correlate exactly to what was modeled (53hz F3 w/ .5ish Qtc for Mag, 42hz F3 w/ .8ish Qtc for Oz ME, 31hz F3 w/ .7ish Qtc for TC12.) The Mag isn't bad sealed, its just obvious its geared more towards ported alignments. Don't get me wrong, I really did like the Mag... It got louder than the other two and tonally, it was basically perfect. I really would love to hear what you claim with my own ears though, must have had some tremendous cabin gain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
New SI Mag
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh