Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="beatz06" data-source="post: 868490" data-attributes="member: 560739">first id like to say wow those W7&#039;s hit hard and get low-i felt my heart tremble in my chest. they had 4 car replica&#039;s set up across the expo luckily jl and mtx wasnt&#039;nt too far apart to compare the two. on the mtx 9500&#039;s- you ever been in a gun fight? these subs sound like a machine going off!! we put in a pantera cd(vulgar display of power-R.I.P. DIMEBAG) in the hu and those subs just about knocked me through the plexyglass window. the subs didnt skip a beat clean and extremly punchy and loud! i wasnt too empressed with mtx&#039;s amps you can hear alot of noise coming out of those amps-and when we really cranked it clipped once but the mtx sales guy fixed the loose rca.in the jl car wasnt impressed at all with their new zr components but those werent for me im sure somebody likes them-hell i like infinity reference components. anyways was very impresssed with the W7&#039;s spl abilities-the subs have very good linear excursion and stay cool. as far as sq is concerned it depends on what your listening to while playing master p the mega low notes were warm and clean but while listening to metalica the bass was &quot;flutterd&quot; and mashed together. the jl salesman played with the tuning but it only improved allitle. i would definently commit to buying jl amps- very iffecient in full power at 12.5 volts compared to mtx&#039;s 14.4 rating. overal summary mtx 9500 are designed for all types of music and are a true sqspl sub- jl W7&#039;s are 100 percent &quot;clean&quot; spl-not good for rock or blues. sales man commented on this and said jl built the sub around &quot;hip-hop&quot; and &quot;house&quot;-drum and bass and that the W7 was not inteded for sq.morbid angelView Public ProfileSend a private message to morbid angelFind More Posts by morbid angelAdd morbid angel to Your Buddy Listdont think you would laugh at jackhammers. too much considering this post that i just read off of someones thread</blockquote>

[QUOTE="beatz06, post: 868490, member: 560739"] first id like to say wow those W7's hit hard and get low-i felt my heart tremble in my chest. they had 4 car replica's set up across the expo luckily jl and mtx wasnt'nt too far apart to compare the two. on the mtx 9500's- you ever been in a gun fight? these subs sound like a machine going off!! we put in a pantera cd(vulgar display of power-R.I.P. DIMEBAG) in the hu and those subs just about knocked me through the plexyglass window. the subs didnt skip a beat clean and extremly punchy and loud! i wasnt too empressed with mtx's amps you can hear alot of noise coming out of those amps-and when we really cranked it clipped once but the mtx sales guy fixed the loose rca. in the jl car wasnt impressed at all with their new zr components but those werent for me im sure somebody likes them-hell i like infinity reference components. anyways was very impresssed with the W7's spl abilities-the subs have very good linear excursion and stay cool. as far as sq is concerned it depends on what your listening to while playing master p the mega low notes were warm and clean but while listening to metalica the bass was "flutterd" and mashed together. the jl salesman played with the tuning but it only improved allitle. i would definently commit to buying jl amps- very iffecient in full power at 12.5 volts compared to mtx's 14.4 rating. overal summary mtx 9500 are designed for all types of music and are a true sqspl sub- jl W7's are 100 percent "clean" spl-not good for rock or blues. sales man commented on this and said jl built the sub around "hip-hop" and "house"-drum and bass and that the W7 was not inteded for sq. morbid angel View Public Profile Send a private message to morbid angel Find More Posts by morbid angel Add morbid angel to Your Buddy List dont think you would laugh at jackhammers. too much considering this post that i just read off of someones thread [/QUOTE]

Verification