That will NOT happen if you do ribs or feet, I can assure you. Ribs suck. Especially once you start going around towards the back.the gorilla on the back of my leg took 2 hours and i almost fell asleep till he was like "bro are you falling asleeep" to which i was like NOT ANYMORE **** lol
Good on you, man. Ribs still win as my worst. I'd do chest again. Back and shoulders are a walk in the park IMO.my foot wasnt too bad, he said the chest will curt the worst
so far my anchor hurt the most since the A HOLE dug in real bad, like te needle stopped a few times and it was one of my first ones so i was ignorant. took 4 months to fully heal.Good on you, man. Ribs still win as my worst. I'd do chest again. Back and shoulders are a walk in the park IMO.
that wasnt nothing. my wrist ****** and the inside on the elbow and the actual elbow ****** *** tooMy first tat was on my forearm and that was terrible. Everyone says forearm doesn't hurt, must just be my sweet spot. Top of my arm and back of my calf weren't that bad.
Troll fails at trolling. Nietszche was known for existentialism, not nominalism. Go back to your community college philosophy class and let the big boys get back to talking.god is dead. Consult the nominalist known as Fredrich Neitzche![]()
half a sleeve, 18 and proud of it too.You got a sleeve?
SCHOOLEDTroll fails at trolling. Nietszche was known for existentialism, not nominalism. Go back to your community college philosophy class and let the big boys get back to talking.
you can be a nominalist & existentialist.. it denies realism, thus the same as an existentialist.. but you're right, he was known more for existentialism..Troll fails at trolling. Nietszche was known for existentialism, not nominalism. Go back to your community college philosophy class and let the big boys get back to talking.
Think we're getting a bit deep for this thread, but I like where your head is at.you can be a nominalist.. it denies realism, thus the same as an existentialist.. but you're right, he was known more for existentialism..
Ill even elaborate even more,you can be a nominalist & existentialist.. it denies realism, thus the same as an existentialist.. but you're right, he was known more for existentialism..
existentialism denies most realism tenants,
nominalism is a metaphysical view denying realism, or any universals.. or deny correspondence theory of truth..
Troll failz at trolling.. *** GTFO!Think we're getting a bit deep for this thread, but I like where your head is at.
Reminds me of a joke: How many existentialists does it take to screw in a light bulb?Ill even elaborate even more,
Nominalism denies all realism tenants
Existentialism denies most, if not all, realist views.
thus, existential nominalists.. ARE REAL!
---------- Post added at 03:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:28 AM ----------
Troll failz at trolling.. *** GTFO!