Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Need more bass
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shredder2" data-source="post: 8633116" data-attributes="member: 674047"><p>Got me thinking bout what you ran across OP... so i averaged the heights and depths just to see and got 2.9ft3 gross... wierd and first ive seen to come out this way, the original one I rechecked the file in Winisd to see how volume worked out and it was 2.45ft3 with dual 4" ports and was 56" wide. Good call... apparently this shape is tricky and in this case i got more volume with less width. Can't say why but I'll be rechecking volumes by averaging out any height/depth measurements from now on.</p><p></p><p>So that box i posted above was around 2.3 ft3 net @ 37hz... lengthening the port to 24" will drop volume to around 2.2ft3 @ 34hz... widening the box to 56" changes it to 2.35ft3 @ 33.5hz... im gonna recheck a few designs now... those crazy shapes apparently screw you... and its NOTHING to average out heights/ depths to recheck... thx, good call. Here it is averaged out with displacements quick and dirty...</p><p></p><p><img src="https://snag.gy/kqCzH4.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>This is a little more to my liking as far as airspace and tune go...</p><p></p><p><img src="https://snag.gy/xC3VUF.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shredder2, post: 8633116, member: 674047"] Got me thinking bout what you ran across OP... so i averaged the heights and depths just to see and got 2.9ft3 gross... wierd and first ive seen to come out this way, the original one I rechecked the file in Winisd to see how volume worked out and it was 2.45ft3 with dual 4" ports and was 56" wide. Good call... apparently this shape is tricky and in this case i got more volume with less width. Can't say why but I'll be rechecking volumes by averaging out any height/depth measurements from now on. So that box i posted above was around 2.3 ft3 net @ 37hz... lengthening the port to 24" will drop volume to around 2.2ft3 @ 34hz... widening the box to 56" changes it to 2.35ft3 @ 33.5hz... im gonna recheck a few designs now... those crazy shapes apparently screw you... and its NOTHING to average out heights/ depths to recheck... thx, good call. Here it is averaged out with displacements quick and dirty... [IMG]https://snag.gy/kqCzH4.jpg[/IMG] This is a little more to my liking as far as airspace and tune go... [IMG]https://snag.gy/xC3VUF.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Need more bass
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list