Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Join
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Need more bass
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shredder2" data-source="post: 8633116" data-attributes="member: 674047"><p>Got me thinking bout what you ran across OP... so i averaged the heights and depths just to see and got 2.9ft3 gross... wierd and first ive seen to come out this way, the original one I rechecked the file in Winisd to see how volume worked out and it was 2.45ft3 with dual 4" ports and was 56" wide. Good call... apparently this shape is tricky and in this case i got more volume with less width. Can't say why but I'll be rechecking volumes by averaging out any height/depth measurements from now on.</p><p></p><p>So that box i posted above was around 2.3 ft3 net @ 37hz... lengthening the port to 24" will drop volume to around 2.2ft3 @ 34hz... widening the box to 56" changes it to 2.35ft3 @ 33.5hz... im gonna recheck a few designs now... those crazy shapes apparently screw you... and its NOTHING to average out heights/ depths to recheck... thx, good call. Here it is averaged out with displacements quick and dirty...</p><p></p><p><img src="https://snag.gy/kqCzH4.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>This is a little more to my liking as far as airspace and tune go...</p><p></p><p><img src="https://snag.gy/xC3VUF.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shredder2, post: 8633116, member: 674047"] Got me thinking bout what you ran across OP... so i averaged the heights and depths just to see and got 2.9ft3 gross... wierd and first ive seen to come out this way, the original one I rechecked the file in Winisd to see how volume worked out and it was 2.45ft3 with dual 4" ports and was 56" wide. Good call... apparently this shape is tricky and in this case i got more volume with less width. Can't say why but I'll be rechecking volumes by averaging out any height/depth measurements from now on. So that box i posted above was around 2.3 ft3 net @ 37hz... lengthening the port to 24" will drop volume to around 2.2ft3 @ 34hz... widening the box to 56" changes it to 2.35ft3 @ 33.5hz... im gonna recheck a few designs now... those crazy shapes apparently screw you... and its NOTHING to average out heights/ depths to recheck... thx, good call. Here it is averaged out with displacements quick and dirty... [IMG]https://snag.gy/kqCzH4.jpg[/IMG] This is a little more to my liking as far as airspace and tune go... [IMG]https://snag.gy/xC3VUF.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Need more bass
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh