Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 1005398" data-attributes="member: 549629">Starts but doesn&#039;t become? You are really trying hard to not be wrong here, aren&#039;t you? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif If midbass STARTS becoming directional at that frequency, why would you wait an octave to seperate it?I guess Richard Clark and Scott Buwalda and all those other SQ experts how no clue when they run stereo midbass below 200hz (even below 100hz). Because after all, midbass only &#039;starts&#039; becoming directional then, it isn&#039;t really directional for another octave, right?&nbsp; //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifBTW, you&#039;ve changed your story quite a bit from your first post here on the subject. You now admit midbass &#039;starts&#039; becoming directional before, but isn&#039;t really directional for another octave (whatever that means). You said that like you meant that all along, and yet your first post here on the subject said something quite different:</blockquote>

[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 1005398, member: 549629"] Starts but doesn't become? You are really trying hard to not be wrong here, aren't you? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif[/IMG] If midbass STARTS becoming directional at that frequency, why would you wait an octave to seperate it? I guess Richard Clark and Scott Buwalda and all those other SQ experts how no clue when they run stereo midbass below 200hz (even below 100hz). Because after all, midbass only 'starts' becoming directional then, it isn't really directional for another octave, right? [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif[/IMG] BTW, you've changed your story quite a bit from your first post here on the subject. You now admit midbass 'starts' becoming directional before, but isn't really directional for another octave (whatever that means). You said that like you meant that all along, and yet your first post here on the subject said something quite different: [/QUOTE]

Verification