Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
my 2 E8's sealed vs ported...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alex JB" data-source="post: 5517937" data-attributes="member: 602795"><p>OK,</p><p></p><p>So I built the ported box I wanted to with a great result at the tuning frequency of around 34Hz</p><p></p><p>I think I'll keep it like this for a while but I already notice the peak in audible volume around tuning and I'm not sure if I like it.</p><p></p><p>I think I want to acheive a better low end and don't mind if I loose dB, I just want low and smoother curve</p><p></p><p>So here's the question, do the curves below look realistic if I was to turn the ported enclosure into a sealed one?</p><p></p><p>I know the volume of 1.1 cu ft net was ideal for the ported box, but when that goes up to 1.34 cu ft (ading the slot port vol) if I just seal the end up with a plate, seems large, especially as the recomendation for sealed is 0.28 cu ft per sub.</p><p></p><p>What will the it do to the subs going to over double the sealed volume?</p><p></p><p>is it like no air spring, like when a ported box is below it's tune?</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j146/alex_jb/truck/2E8ssealedvsportedinsamebox.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alex JB, post: 5517937, member: 602795"] OK, So I built the ported box I wanted to with a great result at the tuning frequency of around 34Hz I think I'll keep it like this for a while but I already notice the peak in audible volume around tuning and I'm not sure if I like it. I think I want to acheive a better low end and don't mind if I loose dB, I just want low and smoother curve So here's the question, do the curves below look realistic if I was to turn the ported enclosure into a sealed one? I know the volume of 1.1 cu ft net was ideal for the ported box, but when that goes up to 1.34 cu ft (ading the slot port vol) if I just seal the end up with a plate, seems large, especially as the recomendation for sealed is 0.28 cu ft per sub. What will the it do to the subs going to over double the sealed volume? is it like no air spring, like when a ported box is below it's tune? [IMG]http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j146/alex_jb/truck/2E8ssealedvsportedinsamebox.png[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Help
Enclosure Design & Construction
my 2 E8's sealed vs ported...
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list