Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
MTX Audio have big ones
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="squeak9798" data-source="post: 2787986" data-attributes="member: 555320"><p>Well from a quick search here are some of the quotes;</p><p></p><p>That comparison is totally meaningless. It really proves nothing. That 10% difference in Xmax (in this case, 2.5mm) is literally inaudible.</p><p></p><p>Power handling doesn't really matter to overall performance, having 250w greater thermal capacity doesn't make it any better from a performance standpoint. (that's excluding the fact that W7's can handle a bit over their rated RMS power handling aswell)</p><p></p><p>"Smallest useable" enclosure size //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif I could use a .1cuft enclosure if I really wanted.....hence it's "useable". Extremely ambiguous, and doesn't really make the 9500 any "better" than the W7 <em>even if</em> it were true. And 1cuft for the W7 is still a pretty darn small box....not like you'd need a truck to tote it around.</p><p></p><p>The rest of it is just general sub-to-sub design difference</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="squeak9798, post: 2787986, member: 555320"] Well from a quick search here are some of the quotes; That comparison is totally meaningless. It really proves nothing. That 10% difference in Xmax (in this case, 2.5mm) is literally inaudible. Power handling doesn't really matter to overall performance, having 250w greater thermal capacity doesn't make it any better from a performance standpoint. (that's excluding the fact that W7's can handle a bit over their rated RMS power handling aswell) "Smallest useable" enclosure size [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif[/IMG] I could use a .1cuft enclosure if I really wanted.....hence it's "useable". Extremely ambiguous, and doesn't really make the 9500 any "better" than the W7 [I]even if[/I] it were true. And 1cuft for the W7 is still a pretty darn small box....not like you'd need a truck to tote it around. The rest of it is just general sub-to-sub design difference [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
MTX Audio have big ones
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list