Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thnking" data-source="post: 2647571" data-attributes="member: 571105">Buffalohed is right on the money.You continue to repeat the same things, which have no relation to what you&#039;ve originally said.&nbsp; I never argued AGAINST mid-bass positioning up front or aimed based on localization, I&#039;m arguing that aiming it based SOLEY on azimuth localization is going to have the give the same localization results.&nbsp; There is no perceptual depth and height cues within the midbass frequencies.&nbsp; Height is mainly an upper frequency cue and depth is mainly a HTRF, psychoacoustic, and learned cue.Just because someone is an engineer, doesn&#039;t give them the ability to correctly theorize on acoustical localization principles.&nbsp; Like I said, this is based on R&amp;amp;D well beyond what a single individual can do and well outside a person&#039;s budget.You’re avoiding any discussion on how you’ve come to these conclusions and not providing any established reference to back up these ideas which go against proven and well known theories on localization.again /temper tantrumNo one called you dumb or a bad installer.&nbsp; You just simply don’t understand localization principles very well.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thnking, post: 2647571, member: 571105"] Buffalohed is right on the money. You continue to repeat the same things, which have no relation to what you've originally said. I never argued AGAINST mid-bass positioning up front or aimed based on localization, I'm arguing that aiming it based SOLEY on azimuth localization is going to have the give the same localization results. There is no perceptual depth and height cues within the midbass frequencies. Height is mainly an upper frequency cue and depth is mainly a HTRF, psychoacoustic, and learned cue. Just because someone is an engineer, doesn't give them the ability to correctly theorize on acoustical localization principles. Like I said, this is based on R&D well beyond what a single individual can do and well outside a person's budget. You’re avoiding any discussion on how you’ve come to these conclusions and not providing any established reference to back up these ideas which go against proven and well known theories on localization. again /temper tantrum No one called you dumb or a bad installer. You just simply don’t understand localization principles very well. [/QUOTE]

Verification