Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thnking" data-source="post: 2642947" data-attributes="member: 571105">What information&#039;s been regurgitated....or is that your boilerplate response when you don&#039;t have something to rebut.Quite a lot of studies are near field, most spatial processing research for earphones are conducted in the near field<a href="http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;q=NEARFIELD+SPATIAL+localization+audio&amp;amp;btnG=Search" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/search?num=50&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;q=NEARFIELD+SPATIAL+localization+audio&amp;amp;btnG=Search</a>Wow, what do you know, 52,900 hits…and it&#039;s not like that changes the fact that tactile sensation doesn&#039;t provide 3- dimensional localization.You have no ground to stand on saying car&#039;s that follow the same principles you preach sound good.&nbsp; I honestly bet they do.&nbsp; There is absolutely nothing I can think of that that merits midbass up front sounding worse that midbass located in other places.&nbsp; There is nothing wrong with trying to recreate a soundstage someone is familiar with....whether it represents the actual soundstage or just a soundstage someone feels is right.&nbsp;&nbsp; I never said anything to contradict this...it&#039;s the principles behind your arguments which are wrong.&nbsp; &nbsp; It&#039;s the fact that midbass doesn&#039;t have to be located in the front, and frequencies coming from the front speakers don&#039;t need to reproduce 40hz-20Khz for a soundstage to be accurately reproduced.Give me the funds / and setup a double blind listening non-biased group...and I&#039;ll gladly put you in your place.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thnking, post: 2642947, member: 571105"] What information's been regurgitated....or is that your boilerplate response when you don't have something to rebut. Quite a lot of studies are near field, most spatial processing research for earphones are conducted in the near field [URL="http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&q=NEARFIELD+SPATIAL+localization+audio&btnG=Search"]http://www.google.com/search?num=50&hl=en&q=NEARFIELD+SPATIAL+localization+audio&btnG=Search[/URL] Wow, what do you know, 52,900 hits…and it's not like that changes the fact that tactile sensation doesn't provide 3- dimensional localization. You have no ground to stand on saying car's that follow the same principles you preach sound good. I honestly bet they do. There is absolutely nothing I can think of that that merits midbass up front sounding worse that midbass located in other places. There is nothing wrong with trying to recreate a soundstage someone is familiar with....whether it represents the actual soundstage or just a soundstage someone feels is right. I never said anything to contradict this...it's the principles behind your arguments which are wrong. It's the fact that midbass doesn't have to be located in the front, and frequencies coming from the front speakers don't need to reproduce 40hz-20Khz for a soundstage to be accurately reproduced. Give me the funds / and setup a double blind listening non-biased group...and I'll gladly put you in your place. [/QUOTE]

Verification