Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Thnking" data-source="post: 2638997" data-attributes="member: 571105">Oh really, and what am I saying that&#039;s wrong?&nbsp; Are you trying to say theories aren&#039;t based on reality...or that established theories aren&#039;t based on reality...The idea of &quot;tactile energy&quot; having very pronounced and significant effects on depth and vertical localization cues - which is what HebrewHammer is saying happens - is a theory.&nbsp; There is no established real world evidence to back it up, it&#039;s something he read somewhere and somehow applied to mid bass localization.&nbsp;&nbsp; As a result of varying the location of midbass, he believes he can localize it based on this energy, yet there are different explanations of why this happens.So which theory is wrong, how do you have the ability to differentiate...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Thnking, post: 2638997, member: 571105"] Oh really, and what am I saying that's wrong? Are you trying to say theories aren't based on reality...or that established theories aren't based on reality... The idea of "tactile energy" having very pronounced and significant effects on depth and vertical localization cues - which is what HebrewHammer is saying happens - is a theory. There is no established real world evidence to back it up, it's something he [B]read[/B] somewhere and somehow applied to mid bass localization. As a result of varying the location of midbass, he believes he can localize it based on this energy, yet there are different explanations of why this happens. So which theory is wrong, how do you have the ability to differentiate...[IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification