Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="helotaxi" data-source="post: 2638939" data-attributes="member: 550915">Personally my focus would be getting the midbass playing as low as possible.&nbsp; A cone midrange should be able to effortlessly cover above 200hz and still be fine on the top end as well.&nbsp; Of course a good tweeter will keep the mid from having to go that high anyway.&nbsp; The more of the frequency range you can get coming from a single driver, the better off you will be.&nbsp; For one you will get a point source, alleviating any time domain issues.&nbsp; Second you will not have to worry about crossover shift in that region of the audio spectrum.&nbsp; Mounting the mid and the tweet on the same plane and axis, you can get them to be pretty close to the ideal, especially if you are using a digital crossover where phase shift isn&#039;t an issue.Ah, yes.&nbsp; Once again Thnking takes the wrong side on theory vs. reality cause he fully knows that his books on acoustical theory and electrical theory trump reality.&nbsp; Unfortunately reality was never infromed that it was a lame duck.&nbsp; We&#039;ll get right on that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif</blockquote>

[QUOTE="helotaxi, post: 2638939, member: 550915"] Personally my focus would be getting the midbass playing as low as possible. A cone midrange should be able to effortlessly cover above 200hz and still be fine on the top end as well. Of course a good tweeter will keep the mid from having to go that high anyway. The more of the frequency range you can get coming from a single driver, the better off you will be. For one you will get a point source, alleviating any time domain issues. Second you will not have to worry about crossover shift in that region of the audio spectrum. Mounting the mid and the tweet on the same plane and axis, you can get them to be pretty close to the ideal, especially if you are using a digital crossover where phase shift isn't an issue. Ah, yes. Once again Thnking takes the wrong side on theory vs. reality cause he fully knows that his books on acoustical theory and electrical theory trump reality. Unfortunately reality was never infromed that it was a lame duck. We'll get right on that [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Verification