Michael Vick Fails To Inspire Team With Dogfighting Story

There are many laws that govern hunting...
i am not saying that its illegal to hunt. but as a person. what make a hunter that sits and wait for a deer to shoot them dead any different from vick killing dogs. I am not speaking about the law. I am more talking about the principle. why is a hunter able to kill inocent animals and get payed and noticed for it and vick (or any dog fighter) gets jail time and his name sh*ted on?

 
whats the purpose of hunting? to be honest, I never knew there was a purpose for hunting.
Food, sport, culture, etc. Believe it or not, there are people in this country that rely on hunting in order to feed their families. Also, hunting can be a cultural thing. Hunting is a way of life for many people in rural areas, and to take that away from them or argue against it is ignorant.

Of coarse there are poachers who kill animals for no good reason at all, and those people are no better than Mike Vick. But the overwhelming majority of hunters and fisherman kill for a purpose. Also, hunting keeps the numbers of certain animals in check. For example, if deer hunting were outlawed, the deer population would explode. This would lead to much starvation and more deer being killed on highways.

I should probably re-phrase my "educate yourself" statement, so here goes; Please educate yourself to the specifics of a topic before you start a debate. Is that better?

 
i am not saying that its illegal to hunt. but as a person. what make a hunter that sits and wait for a deer to shoot them dead any different from vick killing dogs. I am not speaking about the law. I am more talking about the principle. why is a hunter able to kill inocent animals and get payed and noticed for it and vick (or any dog fighter) gets jail time and his name sh*ted on?
First of all, I didn't quote you or mention anything about the legality of hunting. Secondly, killing an unsuspecting deer with a broad head through the heart or bullet from a high powered .7mm rifle is a hell of a lot different than hanging or drowning a dog. Surely you can see that...

 
Food, sport, culture, etc. Believe it or not, there are people in this country that rely on hunting in order to feed their families. Also, hunting can be a cultural thing. Hunting is a way of life for many people in rural areas, and to take that away from them or argue against it is ignorant.
Of coarse there are poachers who kill animals for no good reason at all, and those people are no better than Mike Vick. But the overwhelming majority of hunters and fisherman kill for a purpose. Also, hunting keeps the numbers of certain animals in check. For example, if deer hunting were outlawed, the deer population would explode. This would lead to much starvation and more deer being killed on highways.

I should probably re-phrase my "educate yourself" statement, so here goes; Please educate yourself to the specifics of a topic before you start a debate. Is that better?

I actually heard that they kill animals to keep the population at a certain rate (with wild pigs.. have to love animal planet) and I do understand that some people still hunt or fish to eat. But what about the ppl that hunt for fun? just to keep their heads as trophies. I just dont see the fairness in some ways.

 
I actually heard that they kill animals to keep the population at a certain rate (with wild pigs.. have to love animal planet) and I do understand that some people still hunt or fish to eat. But what about the ppl that hunt for fun? just to keep their heads as trophies. I just dont see the fairness in some ways.
Life aint fair brah.

 
But what about the ppl that hunt for fun? just to keep their heads as trophies. I just dont see the fairness in some ways.
Hunting is a sport, and it's human nature on a deep & primordial level. There are cultures in many countries that still cultivate or kill everything they eat. They've been doing so since the dawn of mankind.

And fyi, most people that sport hunt still eat or gift the meat they kill...

 
Ok, not trying to be an a*s or a d*ck.. lets say vick did the dog fighting (as a sport) and whatever dof lost (died) they ate. will it be fine then? Just trying to get an understanding on what ppl think was wrong
Not in America.

Anyways dog fighting is inhumane. Shooting a deer in the head is instant death and those that are shitty hunters and make the animal suffer should have the same fate brought upon them. If you really cant see the difference than I really dont know how else to explain it to you.

 
Ok, not trying to be an a*s or a d*ck.. lets say vick did the dog fighting (as a sport) and whatever dof lost (died) they ate. will it be fine then? Just trying to get an understanding on what ppl think was wrong
So, you're one of those "hypothetical" types.

You're wrong, and you've already resorted to stupid "what-if" scenarios to justify your point of view. You're going to take an anti-hunting standpoint no matter what facts are provided, because that's your personal opinion. Let's just stop this discussion, okay?

 
LOL!!!! that was one game.. lol.. if palumalo was in the game. he would of killed knox on that game tying touchdown..lol.. we will see at the end of the season.. lol
if frogs had wings, they wouldn't bump their a$$es on the ground. Also, it's not like we were without injuries. Urlacher and Pisa were nowhere in sight.

BEARS > steelers //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

tappin_azz

10+ year member
The Wiggler Pimp
Thread starter
tappin_azz
Joined
Location
tha duuurty
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
51
Views
971
Last reply date
Last reply from
k_schutte
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top