Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
MB Quart DCS 1500.1D or Keep my hifonics 1606D??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="microhaxo" data-source="post: 6564489" data-attributes="member: 570733"><p>I have an Acoustic Elegance Sub that i love, the SQ is amazing. I was told that if i changed amps to the MB Quart DSC 1500.1D that i would notice a significant increase in SQ.</p><p></p><p>I dont run any bass boost and the deck and amps are tuned via oscilloscope to prevent any chance of clipping.</p><p></p><p>Should i just keep my 1606D or should i sell it and buy a DSC 1500.1 I have gotten a few answers but i want to know from anyone who has this amp if there is really a big difference SQ wise.</p><p></p><p>Keep in mind im only running 1000w RMS.</p><p></p><p>The thing that gets me is that Sonic lists that the 1610D THD is 0.08% at RMS and that the DSC 1500.1D is 0.10% THD at RMS.</p><p></p><p>Yet i hear that the DSC is a much better amp quality wise?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="microhaxo, post: 6564489, member: 570733"] I have an Acoustic Elegance Sub that i love, the SQ is amazing. I was told that if i changed amps to the MB Quart DSC 1500.1D that i would notice a significant increase in SQ. I dont run any bass boost and the deck and amps are tuned via oscilloscope to prevent any chance of clipping. Should i just keep my 1606D or should i sell it and buy a DSC 1500.1 I have gotten a few answers but i want to know from anyone who has this amp if there is really a big difference SQ wise. Keep in mind im only running 1000w RMS. The thing that gets me is that Sonic lists that the 1610D THD is 0.08% at RMS and that the DSC 1500.1D is 0.10% THD at RMS. Yet i hear that the DSC is a much better amp quality wise? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Amplifiers
MB Quart DCS 1500.1D or Keep my hifonics 1606D??
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list
