Let The Truth Be Told!

Status
Not open for further replies.
wait... so the mods do have ban powers now?
Yes, under false pretenses. Anyone who agrees with Phats reasoning for doing this is dellusional and irrational. You don't play a lies and deceit game when you're trying to accomplish something. I agree, mods have needed banning power at times in the past, but do they all the time? Will it get out of hand? That was what I was deciding and was actually almost ready to grant them banning powers before tonight's drama. But now I'm thinking maybe the other times were just inside pranks too? Who's to know what was real and what wasn't?

 
I also don't see why PhatTony is getting the majority of everybody's anger... he did snitch, but if he didn't then we would still be thinking it was icix or whatever forum they were claiming to be.

 
Yes, under false pretenses. Anyone who agrees with Phats reasoning for doing this is dellusional and irrational. You don't play a lies and deceit game when you're trying to accomplish something. I agree, mods have needed banning power at times in the past, but do they all the time? Will it get out of hand? That was what I was deciding and was actually almost ready to grant them banning powers before tonight's drama. But now I'm thinking maybe the other times were just inside pranks too? Who's to know what was real and what wasn't?
Why would that matter?

 
i dont think the admin is going to be able to read all of these posts. its been almost 2 hours and already 12 pages. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

EDIT i know hes in here but **** ive done skipped 3 pages.

 
I also don't see why PhatTony is getting the majority of everybody's anger... he did snitch, but if he didn't then we would still be thinking it was icix or whatever forum they were claiming to be.

he is getting anger casue he was involved he has all but come out and said it. read what he types and how it all went down. its not hard to figure out

he snitched to cover his *** and tracks.

 
What you don't understand is what I did...I knew was against the TOS. I didn't care, and I knew there was a small chance I'd get caught. Either way you look at it, there are going to be those that agree and those that disagree. You think I enjoyed googling that crap and then having to upload it to imageshack and whatnot? I don't get my jollies off by looking at b1tches with cawks. I made a sacrafice just like you did.
Anyone that agrees with what you did is a fokin sick ****, bottom line!

 
Yes, under false pretenses. Anyone who agrees with Phats reasoning for doing this is dellusional and irrational. You don't play a lies and deceit game when you're trying to accomplish something. I agree, mods have needed banning power at times in the past, but do they all the time? Will it get out of hand? That was what I was deciding and was actually almost ready to grant them banning powers before tonight's drama. But now I'm thinking maybe the other times were just inside pranks too? Who's to know what was real and what wasn't?


you make a valid point, and it would be foolish to say it wasn't done for some entertainment value. i dont know. i think for the forum to work better and more smoothly we need to have more communication with the people(s) in charge.. namely you. i mean no offence but we rarely see you or have a chance to communicate with you. i know you're a busy person but it couldn't possibly hurt to drop a line more often. this reminds me of why microsoft is failing right now. not because it dosen't have plenty of potential, but because the companys at war with itself and everything is getting missunderstood or not being attended to as it should

 
Yes, under false pretenses. Anyone who agrees with Phats reasoning for doing this is dellusional and irrational. You don't play a lies and deceit game when you're trying to accomplish something. I agree, mods have needed banning power at times in the past, but do they all the time? Will it get out of hand? That was what I was deciding and was actually almost ready to grant them banning powers before tonight's drama. But now I'm thinking maybe the other times were just inside pranks too? Who's to know what was real and what wasn't?
I think some mods needs banning rights, the more mature ones //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif.

 
Yes, under false pretenses. Anyone who agrees with Phats reasoning for doing this is dellusional and irrational. You don't play a lies and deceit game when you're trying to accomplish something. I agree, mods have needed banning power at times in the past, but do they all the time? Will it get out of hand? That was what I was deciding and was actually almost ready to grant them banning powers before tonight's drama. But now I'm thinking maybe the other times were just inside pranks too? Who's to know what was real and what wasn't?

with all "pranks" aside itll help get rid of scammers.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

PhatTonyDeMarco

5,000+ posts
C0CK,its whats for dinner
Thread starter
PhatTonyDeMarco
Joined
Location
West Palm Beach, FL
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
607
Views
13,697
Last reply date
Last reply from
ngsm13
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top