Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Image dynamics id 8
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlugButter" data-source="post: 8813826" data-attributes="member: 678073"><p>It also depends on what type of response you want. A ported type response will require more cone area for the radiators than the subs regardless of throw. You have mechanical loss when using radiators that a port doesn’t have, which can be kinda counteracted by having more radiators cone area than the subs. When I did my 8 with a single 10 inch radiator in a ported box air space, the radiator went over the max 51 mm of xmax. In a sealed box air space that same radiator only had 40 mm xmax. Adding the 2nd 10 radiator in a ported air space design gives me really close to a ported box sound (not quite as loud because of physical mechanical loss, but close), and the radiators move about 32 mm each at tuning. Radiator setups are tricky but I really like the versatility of what can be done with them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlugButter, post: 8813826, member: 678073"] It also depends on what type of response you want. A ported type response will require more cone area for the radiators than the subs regardless of throw. You have mechanical loss when using radiators that a port doesn’t have, which can be kinda counteracted by having more radiators cone area than the subs. When I did my 8 with a single 10 inch radiator in a ported box air space, the radiator went over the max 51 mm of xmax. In a sealed box air space that same radiator only had 40 mm xmax. Adding the 2nd 10 radiator in a ported air space design gives me really close to a ported box sound (not quite as loud because of physical mechanical loss, but close), and the radiators move about 32 mm each at tuning. Radiator setups are tricky but I really like the versatility of what can be done with them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
Image dynamics id 8
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list