Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="jlaine" data-source="post: 247722" data-attributes="member: 542392">Wrong again.Please reference factual and documented information proving your theory before we continue this argument.I&#039;ll quote an old conversation going into detail why utp is pointless.Now I&#039;d almost buy your idea, except for the reality you are attempting to state that shielding will induct noise, when it really can&#039;t, the potential isn&#039;t there.Problem is, I could never even realistically reproduce such an instance like you are purporting even if I wanted to.Your other &quot;idea&quot; about low frequency is also flawed and I&#039;ll go into detail as to why.Shielding is used in pro sound to eliminate (for the most part) 60 cycle noise induced by ballasts and other radiant sources from power lines, lights, etc. That is in no way high frequency - and guess what?Yup... It works.Try running UTP across that region (in an unbalanced line) once and see what you get other than a LOT of induced noise.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="jlaine, post: 247722, member: 542392"] Wrong again. Please reference factual and documented information proving your theory before we continue this argument. I'll quote an old conversation going into detail why utp is pointless. Now I'd almost buy your idea, except for the reality you are attempting to state that shielding will induct noise, when it really can't, the potential isn't there. Problem is, I could never even realistically reproduce such an instance like you are purporting even if I wanted to. Your other "idea" about low frequency is also flawed and I'll go into detail as to why. Shielding is used in pro sound to eliminate (for the most part) 60 cycle noise induced by ballasts and other radiant sources from power lines, lights, etc. That is in no way high frequency - and guess what? Yup... It works. Try running UTP across that region (in an unbalanced line) once and see what you get other than a LOT of induced noise. [/QUOTE]

Verification