brtnboarder3241
5,000+ posts
Banned
o rly?
i swear with the number of threads about nfl i would think this forum would have an official nfl thread..guess not
i swear with the number of threads about nfl i would think this forum would have an official nfl thread..guess not
- Thread Starter
- #3
I believe we do, but I don't care. I'm excited enough to warrant my own thread so STFU
bigbangtheory
5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
ZOMG you root for more than 1 team too! That is like half the NFL there pal!
That was for doucherocket Icetea AKA Lugnutzk.
Also the Broncos played the worst team in the NFL. I wouldn't base the one game like others are as well as them being superbowl bound.
Packers looked good, I was rooting for Minnesota, but their QB sucks *** at the passing game. Yeah he can rush, whatever.........they have two awesome RB's to do that!
That was for doucherocket Icetea AKA Lugnutzk.
Also the Broncos played the worst team in the NFL. I wouldn't base the one game like others are as well as them being superbowl bound.
Packers looked good, I was rooting for Minnesota, but their QB sucks *** at the passing game. Yeah he can rush, whatever.........they have two awesome RB's to do that!
95ZJ
10+ year member
The Resident Ginger
Culpepper should of come back to Minnesota //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif.
- Thread Starter
- #6
I don't think the Broncs are superbowl bound, but I think they may have a chance for the Playoffs this year. They played a bad team, but they played well, play calling was good, and they didn't make many mistakes. Plus the fact that Royal had such a good game means we could be more of a threat in the air than previously thought.
And I root for two teams because I grew up in South Dakota, where your choices are the Broncs and the Vikings. And I moved to wisconsin 11 years ago, so I have to root for the Packers (even if they did screw Favre out of a Super Bowl).
bigbangtheory
5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Shit, I would rather see old timer Gus Ferrotte back in there or even the new kid on the block John David Booty.
Fawk Tavaris Jackson......he blows chunks!
Fawk Tavaris Jackson......he blows chunks!
bigbangtheory
5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Meh, they may make the playoffs.........maybe, but wouldn't count on it.
You should have went with the Vikings, lol! Also they played well tonight, but that is the thing, the Raiders have been known as of late to make mediorce teams look like a "superbowl bound" team. I will be fair and say the Bronc's might go 9-7 more like .500 IMO.
Rodgers looked pretty good tonight. He did learn the whole eye movement like Farve does so well. I give him another few starts before I judge him. He may be pretty good, who knows.
- Thread Starter
- #9
Um the Vikings haven't won a superbowl since 1969 and haven't won a conference championship since 1976. I think I made the right decision
They were 7-9 last year. Cutler is more experienced now, and they've picked up some good players at key spots. If they only win 1 or 2 more I will be very disappointed to say the least.
As for Rogers, I still think the Packers have thrown a possible Super Bowl away, but he should serve them well enough. He did spend several years learning from the best there's ever been after all. I just hope they win by big margins a couple games this year so Brom can get some experience. He could make a very potent backup if he gets some time on the field.
bigbangtheory
5,000+ posts
CarAudio.com Veteran
Vikings might make a run for the playoffs this year as well, if they can get Tavaris to pass the ball decently. I know they ****, I just perfer them over the pack is all.Um the Vikings haven't won a superbowl since 1969 and haven't won a conference championship since 1976. I think I made the right decision
They were 7-9 last year. Cutler is more experienced now, and they've picked up some good players at key spots. If they only win 1 or 2 more I will be very disappointed to say the least.
As for Rogers, I still think the Packers have thrown a possible Super Bowl away, but he should serve them well enough. He did spend several years learning from the best there's ever been after all. I just hope they win by big margins a couple games this year so Brom can get some experience. He could make a very potent backup if he gets some time on the field.
Prepare to be dissappointed by Denver. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif
Rogers will do OK I believe. He knows he has the biggest spotlight on him in the NFL right now and he did good tonight. Showed a lot of character out there and I feel a few more decent starts and the stress will come off and may even do better once that light is lifted. Problem that could be is that he starts to **** and that light will never get lifted and you may see Brom. If so, consider the Pack to have a horrendous year if Brom is at the helm.
- Thread Starter
- #11
The Vikes may have a shot at the playoffs this year, as long as Peterson doesn't get injured. But now that Orton is leading the Bears and Rogers has proven he doesn't ****, the division just got more interesting. They might only have a shot at a wild card spot.
I think the broncs have a better chance than you may give them credit for. Cutler is smarter than he was. He has good recievers. The O-line is better. Their defense should be better against the run and they have two of the best corners in the league. And as always, they can run the ball successfully. As long as Cutler continues to play smart and the Defense stays half-way strong against the run, they'll be decent this year. If nothing else, they have the building blocks for a very good team a couple years down the line.
Rogers won't be dumped for Brom. Brom is good, but he's too inexperienced. He has the tools to be very good one day, but he's not ready yet.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Similar threads
- Started by Bluecarz77
- General Car Audio
About this thread
