Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Guaio" data-source="post: 6840388" data-attributes="member: 622364">Yeah that was my original thought as well. I have an enclosure drawn up with Alpines specs, but when I talked to one of the reps, he was saying to go bigger for my type of situation. The 1.7 cubic inch per sub is the optimal size if you want tha best SPL you can get outta them subs; however, by increasing the size of the chamber from 1.7 ta 2.0-2.2, the rep say&#039;s I&#039;ll see a big difference in the resonance and sound quality when hitting the lower notes. So since I&#039;m not gonna enter any SPL comp&#039;s anytime soon, I feel I should go with my 4.4 cubic design and see how that works. Thanks so much to everyone that&#039;s helped me throughout this thread. I&#039;ve already learned alot, and I haven&#039;t even built anything yet! haha I&#039;ll begin the project today hopefully, and will post up a pic once I&#039;m finished...wish me luck!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Guaio, post: 6840388, member: 622364"] [SIZE=10px]Yeah that was my original thought as well. I have an enclosure drawn up with Alpines specs, but when I talked to one of the reps, he was saying to go bigger for my type of situation. The 1.7 cubic inch per sub is the optimal size if you want tha best SPL you can get outta them subs; however, by increasing the size of the chamber from 1.7 ta 2.0-2.2, the rep say's I'll see a big difference in the resonance and sound quality when hitting the lower notes. So since I'm not gonna enter any SPL comp's anytime soon, I feel I should go with my 4.4 cubic design and see how that works. Thanks so much to everyone that's helped me throughout this thread. I've already learned alot, and I haven't even built anything yet! haha I'll begin the project today hopefully, and will post up a pic once I'm finished...wish me luck![/SIZE] [/QUOTE]

Verification