I apologize!!!

well you just proved how flawed your logic is. anyways, im done trying to proove to you how idiotic you are. do us all a favor and dont post anymore in the lounge. also. dont make any more threads. this is your only warning.
well just go ahead and ban me now if thats what you are threatening, because i haven't done anything wrong... and will try to continue to do nothing wrong...

since your a mod and i'm not, i cannot stop you from making any decision about banning no matter how foolish...

do what you do though!

 
Mike, if he has truly violated the TOS then by all means ban him. But, if you wanna ban him because you think he is a liar and his logic is flawed and because the majority of the forum doesnt like him and are pushing for a ban, then I think it would be a misuse of power.

 
Mike, if he has truly violated the TOS then by all means ban him. But, if you wanna ban him because you think he is a liar and his logic is flawed and because the majority of the forum doesnt like him and are pushing for a ban, then I think it would be a misuse of power.
some people are not intelligent enough to be allowed to use the internet.

 
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/graduate.gif.d982460be9f153bb54e5d4cb744f6ae8.gif
that is ,by the way, a sweet gun!
I can't believe I actually agreed with something you've said. And I thought so too, so much that I bought twins. They are my early christmas present to myself. The woman steals all the rest of my money.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 
Well geez, the guy gets on here and tries to put his lies off on his dad, tells everyone that his dad has these unflattering qualities, then finds out we don't think that's too cool and tries to argue his way out of that as well. Not to mention the fact that he created this thread in the first place. He had it coming. Again.

 
no i know what i ment and i said it correctly... he said i wouldn't ever be able to beat you in a verbal arguement...
Which is likely true as I have a considerably more extensive vocabulary than do you along with the ability to properly implement it. (that latter bit is key, by the way...)

i only addressed the fact that this isn't a verbal argument... because the point of his statement was mute and triffling... not to mention the "premis" of his statement was untrue...("this is a verbal arguement")again...
So if he replaced the single word "verbal" with "typewritten" would you have chosen to respond then? I'm wagering not...

i chose not to answer his statement (as he wanted me to) because i don't shoot ants with shot-guns
it has nothing to do with our arguing ability whatsoever... i never insinuated that it did
This, sir, is a matter of perspective. The rest of us deciphered your posting in one manner and you deciphered it in another.

1 person's opinion Vs basically the rest of the forum who has read this nonsense.

Daddy used to say ~ "If everyone in the platoon is marching the wrong way but you? Guess who needs to about-face..."

weasel like coward of a man??? how is not trusting anyone fully a wrong thing, it seems wise to me... the one thing on this earth that will ALLWAYS let you down and deserves NO trust is a human... so why would you trust ANYONE?!? seems foolish to me... the only way my dad is deceitfull is that he never lets anyone see his mistrust... again, looks pretty wise to me!
The bit in red is quickly followed by...

wow talk about flawed logic? i haven't had words put in my mouth that bad since that guys copied my account!
the not showing your mistrust is what makes all that possible...

if you give them opporotunities, everyone will eventually let you down...

and i would NEVER purposly betray someones trust in me...

and i would trust my wife and friends to a certain extent but i'm not going to be stupid...

i'm not gunna hire some ripped latin guy to clean my pool while shes home with him alone...

i'm not gunna let my friend take my car to mexico for a week...

the only one, (in my opinion) that fully deserves trust is God, everyone else is on an innocent untill proven guilty status
How can you make that statement with any degree of conviction? According to you the most untrustworthy creature on God's green Earth is the animal known as "human."

Are you not human?

If so - how is it that you're so much more trustworthy than every other human on the planet?

How is it that you're so superior to all the rest of us?

Flawed logic indeed, fella.

By your own statements I call into question the validity of your claim that you would never intentionally violate someone's trust in you.

According to you humans are the least reliable creature there is.

So - by definition - that makes you not only untrustworthy but a blatant liar.

Are you truly that stupid that you cannot see it?

I know you're viewing as a guest so my posting isn't entirely in vain.

Enjoy your vacation. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wave.gif.002382ce7d7c19757ab945cc69819de1.gif

Mike, if he has truly violated the TOS then by all means ban him. But, if you wanna ban him because you think he is a liar and his logic is flawed and because the majority of the forum doesnt like him and are pushing for a ban, then I think it would be a misuse of power.
I've been waiting for someone to make mention of this.

Normally it is myself complaining about this so I decided I'd leave that duty to whoever saw fit to pick up the slack.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 
aw hell, it was Cot. You know he was going to keep on until he was banned. He knows of no other way to stop.
I know what you are saying. But answer me this? Keep doing what? If it doesnt include a TOS violation then it wasnt deserved. Being a douche, ***, or a liar is not a TOS violation.

 
I know what you are saying. But answer me this? Keep doing what? If it doesnt include a TOS violation then it wasnt deserved. Being a douch, ***, or a liar is not a TOS violation.
It is now:thumbsup:

Why ya think the reason was for the mass ban recently? lol

 
aw hell, it was Cot. You know he was going to keep on until he was banned. He knows of no other way to stop.
I must say that after Mike and Tom's most recent shenanigans I'm really surprised that tapout's remark was the first I've seen of that nature.

Did I find the bannings funny?

Yes, admittedly I did.

Do I think they were warranted?

Well, in cot's place, no I don't.

As for the people from the "ish is getting old fast" thread I haven't reviewed it thoroughly enough to know if those bannings were warranted and I do not care enough to bother now.

So - all in all I have to agree with tapout that there is more than a small degree of impropriety here.

And this type of stuff is due, in no small part, why I have no interest in being part of the moderation team.

I do not wish to potentially succumb to the "power" and become a hypocrite after someone like cot absolutely works my last nerve and I throw down a banning simply because they pissed me off. I've complained about it too much in the past to risk exacting that same type of revenge on someone myself.

 
Eh, I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on this one. One thing that I was thinking about that you probably are not is the post where he said something to the effect that he did not give a dam about this forum. When I see someone say that I typically think that it is time for that person to go.

I am kinda like DMX on that one, "if it's F me ***** then you know it's F you."

I didn't go back and look that up so I don't know exactly at one point he said it, but it was in this thread.

 
I do not disagree with your opinion on the forum likely being better off in the long run without cotjones' disruptive presence.

So that inandofitself is a moot point.

However - opinions are like ********: Everyone's got one and they all stink.

Having an unpopular opinion isn't a TOS violation and as such shouldn't result in bannage for any length of time as a consequence.

 
I do not disagree with your opinion on the forum likely being better off in the long run without cotjones' disruptive presence.So that inandofitself is a moot point.

However - opinions are like ********: Everyone's got one and they all stink.

Having an unpopular opinion isn't a TOS violation and as such shouldn't result in bannage for any length of time as a consequence.
Okay okay, but I hate to hear you sounding like you agree with Tapout -- that is one crazy mofo.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/bigwave.gif.16324171cad2db62cf4f16568b038478.gif Tapout!

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

cotjones

10+ year member
CarAudio.com Veteran
Thread starter
cotjones
Joined
Location
Wilmington, NC
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
269
Views
3,629
Last reply date
Last reply from
SyKo13
IMG_1882.jpeg

slater

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20251004_120904_Photo Translator.jpg

1aespinoza

    Oct 4, 2025
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top