how bout this?

[da box king 10+ year member]

I am thinking of running my rsd comps in kicks, and get a set of rev coax's for the front and rear doors of my trailblazer. I will have about 130 rms going to each side of the rsd's and about 60 to each rev. Does this sound ok, and will I have to worry about vocal's matching

Click to read more...

 

[bigbangtheory 5,000+ posts]

Why not do two sets of Componets in the front and no rear fill? I did this back in the day in my cavalier. Had buddy fiberglass my pods for kicks and had two sets of JL audio 6.5's. Set in kicks with tweeter in the kicks as well and then other set in door with flush mounted tweeter next to mid. Was my favorite setup to date. Thought about doing this to my Focus as I have the RSD's as well. Then again, getting out of audio for the most part.

 

[da box king 10+ year member]

I was thinking about doing that...or atleast down the road...I still want somethin in the back tho

 

[da box king 10+ year member]

anyone..ttt

 

[eggyhustles 10+ year member]

2 sets of components up front..coaxils in the rear

 

[req 5,000+ posts]

how about this? next time title the thread you make with logic and people will respond with good answers. drives me crazy to no end when all i see is thread titles like this.

sorry about the rant. but please make some effort with your brain. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

 

[MyPoison1 10+ year member]

2 sets of components up front..coaxils in the rear

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/compcrash.gif.4ecfedd515e492755e2899769e83940b.gif

 

[da box king 10+ year member]

well, I figured it would be a good way to get people to look at it, but yeah will think bout it next time.

and will 2 comps in the front work, and a coax in the rear work. One set of rsd's will be ran off my ppi pc4400, 200x2, and then the other set of comps and coaxa will be ran off an eclipse xa4000 amp(125x4). how will that sound, will it work?

 

[95BlackGA 5,000+ posts]

how about this? next time title the thread you make with logic and people will respond with good answers. drives me crazy to no end when all i see is thread titles like this.

sorry about the rant. but please make some effort with your brain. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif

You should make some effort with your brain! Remember, always capitalize the first letter, of the first word, at the beginning of the sentence. Also, you can not start a sentence with 'But'. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif

OP : I would run both sets of Comps off the same amp, or at least same model. Drive them with the same amount of power.

 

[Echo42987 10+ year member]

I vote with everyone else. 2 comps up front and co-ax in the back...Would sound great and have awesome imaging results probably.

-Nick-

 

[da box king 10+ year member]

Ok so I was going to use an eclipse XA4000 that does 125x4@4...that woulr run one set of comps and then my coaxs in the rear. And I also have a ppi pc4400, that I want to use, and was going to use that on the other set of comps and give one set of comps 200x2...

...would this work. I don't want to waste the ppi but it only does 50 x4 @4 so I figured I would bridge it and run a set of comps off it for 200x2. Not too many **** interiors come in 2 ohm otherwise I would run 100x4 off the ppi

...but would this scenario work?