Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Head Units
H/U better than Alpine CDA-9887 performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cam5860" data-source="post: 6844741" data-attributes="member: 566408"><p>I had the prs 880 a few years back. It has the most tuning features and so forth, but i just don't like the sound quality of pioneer. There highs are warm and dull where as alpine highs are crisp and airy. Alpine has the best sound quality period. But the pioneer gives you a better EQ and crossovers and so forth. I would rank kenwood a close second behind alpine. Kenwood excelon products are great. But I ran a alpine pdx and the new kenwood xr-1s on my subs and alpine is cleaner and has better sound quality. Not to say the kenwood is not good. It just don't top the alpine in sound quality. But the kenwood would be my second choice for a digital amp. Specially for the money.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cam5860, post: 6844741, member: 566408"] I had the prs 880 a few years back. It has the most tuning features and so forth, but i just don't like the sound quality of pioneer. There highs are warm and dull where as alpine highs are crisp and airy. Alpine has the best sound quality period. But the pioneer gives you a better EQ and crossovers and so forth. I would rank kenwood a close second behind alpine. Kenwood excelon products are great. But I ran a alpine pdx and the new kenwood xr-1s on my subs and alpine is cleaner and has better sound quality. Not to say the kenwood is not good. It just don't top the alpine in sound quality. But the kenwood would be my second choice for a digital amp. Specially for the money. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Head Units
H/U better than Alpine CDA-9887 performance?
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list