graphics vs parametric EQ

When you're making EQ adjustments, there are 3 parameters to be aware of - amplitude (how much you're boosting/cutting the frequency), the center frequency, and bandwidth (how far above/below the center you're adjusting). A graphic EQ has the center frequencies and bandwidths fixed. A parametric EQ allows you to adjust all three, although the number of center frequencies you can choose may be less.

Both have their uses...although setting large graphic EQs with lots of resolution pretty much requires use of an RTA.

 
When you're making EQ adjustments, there are 3 parameters to be aware of - amplitude (how much you're boosting/cutting the frequency), the center frequency, and bandwidth (how far above/below the center you're adjusting). A graphic EQ has the center frequencies and bandwidths fixed. A parametric EQ allows you to adjust all three, although the number of center frequencies you can choose may be less.
Both have their uses...although setting large graphic EQs with lots of resolution pretty much requires use of an RTA.
So parametric has extra setting for center frequencies and bandwidths.

I need example by value.

 
So parametric has extra setting for center frequencies and bandwidths.
I need example by value.
Read your manual Naga, I have the 9887 as well and this is detailed in the manual.

I personally use parametric. I feel it gives you more options. You select the center frequency, Q factor, and whether you want to amplify it or decrease it. Graphic you can only choose whether to amplify/decrease, the frequency range is predetermined.

Graphic has 7 bands though, Parametric you can only select 5. But I feel you get better tunability with the parametric.

 
Read your manual Naga, I have the 9887 as well and this is detailed in the manual.
I personally use parametric. I feel it gives you more options. You select the center frequency, Q factor, and whether you want to amplify it or decrease it. Graphic you can only choose whether to amplify/decrease, the frequency range is predetermined.

Graphic has 7 bands though, Parametric you can only select 5. But I feel you get better tunability with the parametric.
lol NAGA!

 
Read your manual Naga, I have the 9887 as well and this is detailed in the manual.
I personally use parametric. I feel it gives you more options. You select the center frequency, Q factor, and whether you want to amplify it or decrease it. Graphic you can only choose whether to amplify/decrease, the frequency range is predetermined.

Graphic has 7 bands though, Parametric you can only select 5. But I feel you get better tunability with the parametric.
I did, but the mnual mentioned how to use , not the difference or when to use what.

 
Use whichever one looks the prettiest to you. Because, in all reality with the way that Alpine sets up their EQ in parametric and in graphic there isn't much difference.

I have switched back and forth before and never really noticed much of a difference overall after tuning everything in.

Just don't crank up and down things unnecessarily. You are actually better off to take out the hot frequencies and to boost the weak ones.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

HNaga

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
HNaga
Joined
Location
Cairo
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
10
Views
4,733
Last reply date
Last reply from
HNaga
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top