Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="3.5Max6spd" data-source="post: 1252877" data-attributes="member: 555373">an ideal way to use the drz and make use of the DAC&#039;s would be with full analog processing.......but in order to not lose T/A that would require a separate unit for everyone of those channels<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> Not f&#039;n worth it...period.Heck you can just run a single analog unit....but then that pricetag you paid for the 8 active chs with t/a on the HU becomes a complete waste. They simply dropped the ball with that unit, it could&#039;ve been &#039;great&#039;. Say at least 24/30db slope extra on the x-over, and say a 5band on every channel-heck even a 5 band for every pair of chs- and it could&#039;ve been the end all/be all in a single din. But its not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="3.5Max6spd, post: 1252877, member: 555373"] an ideal way to use the drz and make use of the DAC's would be with full analog processing.......but in order to not lose T/A that would require a separate unit for everyone of those channels:D Not f'n worth it...period. Heck you can just run a single analog unit....but then that pricetag you paid for the 8 active chs with t/a on the HU becomes a complete waste. They simply dropped the ball with that unit, it could've been 'great'. Say at least 24/30db slope extra on the x-over, and say a 5band on every channel-heck even a 5 band for every pair of chs- and it could've been the end all/be all in a single din. But its not. [/QUOTE]

Verification