Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
FatMat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rudy" data-source="post: 7752929" data-attributes="member: 568035"><p>If you don't want a condescending tone, stop using terms like "retarded" boatload of crap" and "BS" and then coming with nothing at all to support your position will always get a response. I'm not even suggesting that people shouldn't support their favorites, but doing it by gratuitously attacking others instead of having a reason other than it making your **** warm isn't helping anyone.</p><p></p><p>Exactly what difference are you going to see on the RTA? Resonance would show as a peak at the resonant frequency(s) of the panel and its/their harmonics. Please show us this reduction at 25%/50% and 100%. What you will certainly see is a lower resonant frequency as you add mass. That's just as likely to be a bad thing as a good thing so nothing there.</p><p></p><p>Being sticky enough to perform it's intended job is a ridiculously low standard. It's worth thinking about because there's been a history of people selling products that didn't even meet that standard. It's still the same thing as raving about a car because it has wheels.</p><p></p><p>You may not approve of my tome but imagine what it's like for me having to deal with you talking out of your ***. I wouldn't have touched this thread id you hadn't decided it would be fun to take cheap shots you couldn't back up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rudy, post: 7752929, member: 568035"] If you don't want a condescending tone, stop using terms like "retarded" boatload of crap" and "BS" and then coming with nothing at all to support your position will always get a response. I'm not even suggesting that people shouldn't support their favorites, but doing it by gratuitously attacking others instead of having a reason other than it making your **** warm isn't helping anyone. Exactly what difference are you going to see on the RTA? Resonance would show as a peak at the resonant frequency(s) of the panel and its/their harmonics. Please show us this reduction at 25%/50% and 100%. What you will certainly see is a lower resonant frequency as you add mass. That's just as likely to be a bad thing as a good thing so nothing there. Being sticky enough to perform it's intended job is a ridiculously low standard. It's worth thinking about because there's been a history of people selling products that didn't even meet that standard. It's still the same thing as raving about a car because it has wheels. You may not approve of my tome but imagine what it's like for me having to deal with you talking out of your ***. I wouldn't have touched this thread id you hadn't decided it would be fun to take cheap shots you couldn't back up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
FatMat
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh