Menu
Forum
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
Car Audio Build Logs
Car Audio Equipment
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Help
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Classifieds
Car Audio Wanted
Classifieds Member Feedback
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Test
Forum
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
Search
Search titles only
Search titles only
What's new
New posts
Live Activity
Search forums
Members
Registered members
Classifieds Member Feedback
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
FatMat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nateberrier" data-source="post: 7752876" data-attributes="member: 612014"><p>Don you are opinionated and push your own agenda as well. Im not saying go with AT or that its the best, but I can tell you 25% and 50% and even 100% makes a difference on the rta regardless of which product youre using. It would also depend on the car. And Im sorry but if the shat doesnt stick its not very useful to me. edead for example I could not get to stick hardly at all. People complain about Fat Mat not sticking. AT I have no trouble with it sticking. Dynamat no trouble either. My goal isnt to keep sound out, it's to change the resonance of the panel. If you were serious about SPL it would be foolish to throw some designated amount on the panels anyway. A 2012 honda civic door panel is not the same as a 1948 panel van either so telling everyone 25% is retarded. You are right though, if youre trying to kill road noise, using traditional sound deadener is foolish.</p><p></p><p>Also you argue with a condescending bias that works against you. Youd make a good fox news host</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nateberrier, post: 7752876, member: 612014"] Don you are opinionated and push your own agenda as well. Im not saying go with AT or that its the best, but I can tell you 25% and 50% and even 100% makes a difference on the rta regardless of which product youre using. It would also depend on the car. And Im sorry but if the shat doesnt stick its not very useful to me. edead for example I could not get to stick hardly at all. People complain about Fat Mat not sticking. AT I have no trouble with it sticking. Dynamat no trouble either. My goal isnt to keep sound out, it's to change the resonance of the panel. If you were serious about SPL it would be foolish to throw some designated amount on the panels anyway. A 2012 honda civic door panel is not the same as a 1948 panel van either so telling everyone 25% is retarded. You are right though, if youre trying to kill road noise, using traditional sound deadener is foolish. Also you argue with a condescending bias that works against you. Youd make a good fox news host [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
General Car Audio
FatMat
Top
Menu
Home
Refresh