Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
elemental designs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="audioholic" data-source="post: 3063750" data-attributes="member: 549629"><p>Is this a joke? eD has lied and cheated their customers to steal their freakin money and you want to just say 'well that was the past'? You need some perspective. </p><p>And their 'past' seems to keep popping up, in their present. The sound deadener mat lies, the Tang Band fiasco, now the W7 frame look-a-like scandal that's currently going on... just because you chose to ignore eD's obviously questionable past, and present, does not mean I will.</p><p></p><p>Mandos, quit spending paragraphs trying to explain the obvious. eD denotes their subs that way for marketing, pure and simple. Trying to justify the reasoning technically, does not bode well. We all know the simple idea behind saying they have more cone area than a 'traditional' driver, but then we all also already understand all the flaws in that stance as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="audioholic, post: 3063750, member: 549629"] Is this a joke? eD has lied and cheated their customers to steal their freakin money and you want to just say 'well that was the past'? You need some perspective. And their 'past' seems to keep popping up, in their present. The sound deadener mat lies, the Tang Band fiasco, now the W7 frame look-a-like scandal that's currently going on... just because you chose to ignore eD's obviously questionable past, and present, does not mean I will. Mandos, quit spending paragraphs trying to explain the obvious. eD denotes their subs that way for marketing, pure and simple. Trying to justify the reasoning technically, does not bode well. We all know the simple idea behind saying they have more cone area than a 'traditional' driver, but then we all also already understand all the flaws in that stance as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
elemental designs
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list