Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mandos" data-source="post: 2970137" data-attributes="member: 561347">It still has more cone area than a conventional 1/2 roll surround on a driver.You do agree with that, correct?You also stated that other drivers which implement a similar tall surround have a similar Sd.I completely agree with you there.So, basically it comes down to the fact that we chose a naming structure which has some marketing in it as well, and Image Dynamics doesn&#039;t.I think what Alex was trying to say is that we never state the drivers are indeed the sizes in their names, which we don&#039;t.&nbsp; But the naming structure was indeed started because it has more cone area than a conventional sub of equal overall diameter.While the subs don&#039;t have the actual cone area of the number in their naming, their cone area is still larger than a conventional half-roll design.&nbsp; Naming was done to show this and as a form of marketing as you&#039;ve mentioned.Personally, I like the name 13Kv.2 a lot more than say, 12.5Kv.2.&nbsp; It&#039;s just there to show it&#039;s a bigger cone than most, but I agree, doesn&#039;t show it&#039;s true size and therefore is marketing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mandos, post: 2970137, member: 561347"] It still has more cone area than a conventional 1/2 roll surround on a driver. You do agree with that, correct? You also stated that other drivers which implement a similar tall surround have a similar Sd. I completely agree with you there. So, basically it comes down to the fact that we chose a naming structure which has some marketing in it as well, and Image Dynamics doesn't. I think what Alex was trying to say is that we never state the drivers are indeed the sizes in their names, which we don't. But the naming structure was indeed started because it has more cone area than a conventional sub of equal overall diameter. While the subs don't have the actual cone area of the number in their naming, their cone area is still larger than a conventional half-roll design. Naming was done to show this and as a form of marketing as you've mentioned. Personally, I like the name 13Kv.2 a lot more than say, 12.5Kv.2. It's just there to show it's a bigger cone than most, but I agree, doesn't show it's true size and therefore is marketing. [/QUOTE]

Verification